So, please don't bring in your attorney if I didn't ask a question that's identical to one that you've worked.
因此请不要带你的律师来,如果我没有考的题目,和你做过的题目相同的话。
I don't mean that the animals are identical me, but their reality is just as pure and indefeasible as my reality.
我并不是说动物和我一样,但它们的现实和我的现实,是一样纯粹,一样不可废弃的。
Even if I have few or no memories, identical to the ones that I had when I was 10, that's OK.
即使我对于10岁那年的东西,记得的很少或是什么也不记得了,没有关系。
So, Case and I did identical questionnaires in Los Angeles and Milwaukee and these are median price expectations.
于是科斯和我在洛杉矶和密尔沃基,做了完全相同的问卷调查,并且调查出了中间价格的期望值
So as I said, they're going to be identical in terms of making the decision that way.
因此就像我说的,如果用这种方法来判断,它们应该是完全相同的。
The point I'm trying to make is, products are not identical.
我尝试表达的观点是,产品不是一模一样的
If it were all the things that it's not, or if it were identical to all the things that somehow or another it's not, then I would be in a very difficult situation because I wouldn't have any means of knowing it in particular.
如果一件事就是它自身的反面,或者和其他的事物没有区分之处,那么我们,就很难认识它,因为我们没有办法认识它。
So this code is identical functionally nonswitch c to the last implementation we saw, nonswitch.c, but I'm just ever-more emphatically saying, "In case 1," that is when n equals 1 -- or when case 2 applies -- when n equals 2 or when n equals 3 do what?
所以这些代码到最后的实现上,功能是,完全相同的,但是我想要再次强调一下,“在case,1“,那是当n等于1时1,或者当case,2适用-,当n等于2或者当n等于3,它将做什么?
I'm going to claim that assuming that products are not identical, is a pretty safe assumption for most of the world, for most things that you're going to see in the world.
我认为假设产品不同,对大多数人来说很容易被接受,对多数情况来说
应用推荐