So the basic idea was fine, but I failed to satisfy the initial condition that the answer had to be between the lower bound and the upper bound. Right?

因此基础的思想是对的，但是程序没能满足,正确答案在给定的区间内这个条件,对不对？

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

And also that we know that the zero does not count as a node, if per se I actually had managed to hit zero in drawing that, so the correct answer would be the bottom one there.

另外你们要知道零点不是节点，假设说我确实把零点画成０了，那正确的结果就是底下这个。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

If I had to ask you to choose a-- no, name a famous psychologist, the answer of most of you would be Freud.

如果我让大家选出一位-,不，是说出一位著名心理学家的名字，你们大家多数人会回答，弗洛伊德。

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

It might turn out if I had X-ray vision that what I see is this... Then the answer'd be there's not one train here.

有可能是,我看到的是这样。,答案就不是同一辆火车。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

And the answer is, "No." All I had in mind, as you know, is just--in talking about the creativity issue-- I just have in mind producing something new, producing something that hasn't been around before.

答案是,我所想的一切,如你所知,只是,在谈论到创造力这个问题时,我只是在脑海中酝酿些新的东西,酝酿一些从来没出现的东西

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选