But at this point, I think it's crucial to remember the point that it's not just the question, "Who's got an explanation?"

但是对于这一点,我认为最为关键的就是记住,问题不仅在于,谁能解释

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

What we've got to turn to next time, then, is the question, what else might it be? Okay.

下次我们要探讨的问题是，还会是什么？，下课。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

National Public Radio asked exactly this question in a survey a year or so ago and they got the following principal responses back.

国家公共广播电台问过,完全相同的问题,在一次一年前的民意调查中,他们得到了如下的回复

耶鲁公开课 - 聆听音乐课程节选

Now we know how we got all the numbers that go into the very question.

现在我们知道,题目中的这些数据是怎么得到的

耶鲁公开课 - 基础物理课程节选

And question number three, the basic idea of consent. Kathleen got us on to this.

至于问题三，就是征得同意的观点，凯思琳提到的。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

The question isn't, is this explanation impossible?' The question is just, who's got the better explanation?' You guys can't offer any kind of explanation at all, yet.

问题不是,这种解释可不可能,问题是,谁的解释更合理,而你们这群人根本就没能做出任何解释

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

And so the question's got to be not only, is the soul distinct?

那么问题将变成不仅仅是,灵魂是否独立于肉体

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

You've got to imagine changing some of the facts about what it would be like to live forever So instead of asking the question ? the question I started with,would it be good to live forever?

你得想象改变一些,关于永生后果的事实,所以不问我开始时的问题,我们不问永生是好事吗？

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选