Just be surgical, give me the answer and move on.
要准确写,给我答案,继续进行。
But I want to stress again, as long as I do the base case right and my inductive or recursive step reduces it to a smaller version of the same problem, the code will in fact converge and give me out an answer.
就开心的去做吧,但是我想再次强调,只要基础事件处理正确而我的递归,或递推步骤能把它简化为更简单的同类问题,那么这段代码就可以收敛。
On Thursday, start the class by asking me that and I'll give you an answer.
星期四,一上课就问我,那时再回答你吧。
If we did that, if we moved f minus 32 over to the left, that would give me a floating point answer because f is a float.
如果你那样做,如果我们把,放前面,那将会给我们一个浮点数答案,因为f是浮点数。
It'd still give me an answer. It just would not be the answer I'm looking for.
然后运行程序,程序还是会返回一个答案,只是不是我想要的答案。
And in fact, now let me ask those two questions about this piece of code. First question is, for what values of integers-- we're going to assume integers-- but for what values of x does this code terminate? And the second question is, for what values of x does it give me back the right answer?
实际上,让我关于这块代码问两个问题,第一个问题是,对于什么样的整数值,我们会假设是整数,对于x的什么值程序,会最终终止?第二个问题是,对于x的什么值程序,会返回正确答案?
应用推荐