So, let's look at another example of thinking about whether we get an answer out that's reasonable.

来考虑是否我们,可以得出一个合理的答案。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

And I get an answer of 3, but it seems to be garbled with my prompt.

我得到了答案3，但是它可能,误解了我的意图。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

The question that we're ultimately hoping to get an answer to: Could I survive my death?

我们最终要,得出答案的问题是：,我可否免于死亡？

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

You can do that, but we like to get the answer the way this gentleman described it, because we like to get an answer more readily than by doing the mundane work.

你可以那样做,但是我们喜欢,用这位同学所说的方法来得到结果,因为我们喜欢更简洁地获得结果,而不是通过繁琐的计算

耶鲁公开课 - 基础物理课程节选

But in fact, it is not. And so, something I find myself repeating over and over again to myself, to my graduate students, is when you get an answer from the computer, always ask yourself, why do I believe it?

但是实际上，它并不是，因此，我一直一遍又一遍的重复的,给我自己和你们这些学生的就是,当计算机给出一个答案后，一定要问问自己为什么要相信这个答案？

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

More fundamentally, I want to get back to what I think of as the main theme of 6.00, which is taking a problem and finding some way to formulate the problem so that we can use computing to help us get an answer.

花一些时间来讲,更重要的是我想，回到我认为的6。00的重点,即处理问题并公式化问题,从而使我们能够靠电脑得出答案。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

Conversely, if you get an answer and it doesn't seem to make sense, then you've got to go back and ask, am I violating some of the assumptions, and here you will find the assumption that the particle had that acceleration a is true as long it's freely falling under gravity but not when you hit the ground.

反过来说,如果你得到一个结果,发现似乎是错的,那么你就应该回过头来问问自己,我是不是违反某些前提了,这个模型中,你就发现,只要质点在重力作用下自由下落,质点具有加速度a的前提是正确的,但是落地后就不成立了

耶鲁公开课 - 基础物理课程节选

Well, how can we ever get to an actual answer?

但怎样才能得到确切的答案呢？

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选