You could argue that both sides had essentially the same kind of oligarchies.

你就可以看出他们双方,都有点寡头主义本质

耶鲁公开课 - 美国内战与重建课程节选

Now, it turns out that this game, this Prisoner's Dilemma, with the Alpha's and Beta's, or essentially the same game, has been played many, many, many times in experiments.

实际上,囚徒困境这个博弈,比如选择α和β,或者类似的博弈,在现实中进行过很多次实验

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Well I talked about it - earlier I've mentioned several times all the cells in my body, all the cells in your body have essentially the same genomic chromosomal DNA in their nucleus.

我之前有说过,我不只一次提到过,我体内的所有细胞,和你体内的所有细胞一样,核中的染色体基因组DNA本质上都相同

耶鲁公开课 - 生物医学工程探索课程节选

I took those same references the exact opposite way, 'cause I thought that essentially he's referring to the temporality of our moral structure, and how it's just this arbitrary code which our society has decided upon.

我对那些参考的理解完全不同，因为我认为本质上他提到了我们道德基准的暂时性,还提到它们如何只是我们社会,随意决定的准则。

耶鲁公开课 - 1945年后的美国小说课程节选

So, if you're at hanging your exam from high school on the fridge and you want to make it look more impressive, you could just rewrite the question as that, and essentially you're answering the same thing.

所以如果你把你的高中测试题,挂在冰箱上,而且想让它看起来更难忘，你仅仅重新写出这个问题就可以了，本质上你是在做相同的事情。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

Is is essentially saying, given 2 things, do they point to exactly the same referent?

或者换种思考的方式，大家记得我说过当我们，调用类的定义声明的时候,它会创建一个实例？

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

repeat Scratch essentially had the same ideas, but they were call repeat and forever and a few other options.

本质上，Scratch有相同的思想，但是他们叫做,和forever和一些其它的选择。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

So a number of you, even if the price was just a tiny bit different might have a preference for one rather than the other, so without getting in trouble by putting the camera on you, how many of you would have a preference, if the prices were essentially the same how many of you would have a strict preference for Pepsi?

那么你们中的很多人,尽管价格只有一点点不同,也许还是倾向于其中一个产品,不让你们上镜头而招来麻烦,你们谁会有倾向,如果价格差不多,谁会倾向选择百事可乐

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So essentially, that is the exact same thing.

所以本质上那是完全相同的事情。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选