When you don't have to worry about criteria like that ordinary, mechanical energy rules supreme, and that's dictating where equilibrium lies.
如果你不担心像这样的要求,通常的机械能就占据主要地位,并且决定平衡位于何处。
In other words, if we don't have to worry about entropy or volume equilibrium is achieved when energy is at a minimum.
换句话说,如果我们不担心熵,和体积的平衡,那么能量就得是最小的。
And so what I get is the energy of the system at the equilibrium separation is given by minus z plus.
这就是通过减去z+得到得平衡分离时,我得到的能量体系。
Still, the actual equilibrium depends on entropy also, not only on the energy.
而且,实际的平衡依赖于熵,而不仅仅是能量。
In the case here, tha t I just illustrated with the little cart going down the valley, would be exactly the same with regular energy, the equilibrium state is one of lowest energy, right.
在现在所考虑的情况下,我刚才所描述的小车沿着山谷下行,结论会像能量判据一样,平衡态是能量最低的态。
In some sense, that's one reason to associate this as a kind of energy, H just like mechanical energy u or enthalpy H, it's the minimum free energy state that is the equilibrium state under the relevant conditions.
在某种意义下,这是我们把这些物理量称为能量的原因,就像机械能U和自由焓,具有最小自由能的状态在特定的条件下,就是平衡态。
应用推荐