So, we have a problem here if we're thinking about keeping things at the lowest energy, so there's a lot of ring strain in the system.
现在有个问题,我们考虑要把能量降到最低,所以环上有许多应力。
If you see a problem that asks you, for example, the third ionization energy versus taking a second electron out of the 2 s in a photoelectron spectroscopy experiment, those are two very different things.
如果你遇到一个题目问你的是,比如说,是第三电离能,还是在光电子能谱实验中从,2,s,轨道中,拿走第二个电子,这可是两个完全不同的问题。
Same sort of subtraction problem, what do we have for the ionization energy of the 2 s electron?
进行类似的减法运算,得到的,2,s,电子的电离能应该是多大呢?
So now we're putting 2 electrons into the same p orbital, that's not a problem, we can do it, it's not a huge energy cost to do that.
现在我们在同一个,p,轨道上放了两个电子,这没问题,我们可以这样做,这样不会亏损太多能量。
I don't care how you do it on exams or on problem sets, but you do need to be aware that the 3 d once filled is lower in energy than the 4 s, and the reason you need to be aware of that is if you're asked for the electron configuration now of the titanium ion.
我不关心你们在考试或者,问题集中如何做它,但是你们的确需要知道3d一旦被填充,它的能量是小于4s的,你们需要知道这个的原因,是如果你现在被要求,写出钛离子的电子构型。
应用推荐