• It was a classical model, right, so we could say the electron is exactly this far away from the nucleus.

    这是个经典模型,对吧,我们说电子离,原子核就是这么远。

    麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

  • If de Broglie is correct, we could then model the electron in its orbit not moving as a particle, but let's model it as a wave.

    如果德布罗意是对的,那么我们可以在电子轨道中建立电子模型,不是像粒子一样运动,而是像波一样运动。

    麻省理工公开课 - 固态化学导论课程节选

  • So, Lewis structures are really a model for a way to think about what the valence electron configuration is, and as I said, it's not based on quantum mechanics, it's something that Lewis observed far, far before quantum mechanics were discovered.

    路易斯结构实际上是一个用来考虑价,电子排布的模型,而就像我说的,它并不以量子力学为基础,而是路易斯在以前发现的,在量子力学出现很早前。

    麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

  • This one is calculable by the Bohr model because lithium 2plus is a one electron system.

    这个可以通过波尔模型计算而得到,因为锂2+是单电子系统。

    麻省理工公开课 - 固态化学导论课程节选

  • But no one dared say we have this little planetary model, I've got an electron orbiting a central nucleus and I am going to endow that electron with quantized states That was a big leap and that was Bohr in postulate five Postulate five I am just going to reproduce.

    但是没有人敢说,我们拥有了这个小行星模型,知道了电子绕原子核运行,现在就要让它使电子处于量化的状态,假设五中波尔的成就是一个跳跃式的进步,假设五中我只需要重申一些东西。

    麻省理工公开课 - 固态化学导论课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定