• So if we have total +2 and complete shielding -1 where that can actually negate a full positive charge, because remember our nucleus is plus 2, +1 one of the electrons is minus 1, so if it totally blocks it, all we would have left from the nucleus is an effective charge of plus 1.

    抵消一个完全的正电荷,因为记住我们的原子核是,其中一个电子是,所以如果它完全挡住了它,我们从原子核中留下的,全部有效电荷就是,所以,在我们的第一个例子中,我们的第一种极端情况。

    麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

  • 2 So what we end up saying is that the z effective or the effective charge that that first electron feels is now going to be plus 2.

    第一个电子感觉到的有效的z或者有效电荷现在是,我们再一次将它带入我们的方程。

    麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

  • The first is this the z effective, or how much charge is actually in the nucleus that's felt, Z or the I guess we would say the z, how much the charge is on the nucleus that holds it close together.

    第一个是有效核电量,或者说实际感受到的核电荷量,又或者我想我可以说就是,使它们保持在一起的,原子核的电荷量。

    麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

  • The electron completely canceled out 1 it's equivalent of charge from the nucleus, such that we only saw in a z effective of 1.

    电子完全抵消了来自原子核的等量电荷,这样我们仅仅看到有效的z为,在极端案例b中。

    麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

  • And the point that I also want to make is the way that they differ, z effective actually differs from the total charge in the nucleus due to an idea called shielding.

    我也想指出的一点是它们不同的方式,有效的z事实上不同于原子核的,总电荷量,因为屏蔽效应。

    麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定