-
That address is nationalpostdoc - all one word - dot org.
VOA: special.2009.01.15
-
So, one way we could look at it is by looking at this density dot diagram, where the density of the dots correlates to the probability density.
其中一个理解它的方法,就是通过看这个密度点图，这里点的密度,和概率密度想关联的。
-
I'm then printing bracket one, bracket two, bracket three, bracket dot, dot, dot up until the total number of arguments, 1 whatever that may be, and it's going to be at least one because the program always has a name.
然后我打印，括号等等等，知道打印完所有的参数，不管那个最大值可能是什么，它将至少为,因为程序总是有一个名字。
-
Why is this much nice? Well, that's a handy piece of code. Because imagine I've got that now, and I can now store that away in some file name, input dot p y, and import into every one of my procedure functions, pardon me, my files of procedures, because it's a standard way of now giving me the input.
为什么这样很好呢？,这是一段很好用的代码,因为想象下如果我有了这段代码,我能把它用某个文件名保存起来,后缀是。py，导入到所有的处理函数中,抱歉，我的处理文件,因为这是一个标准的输入方法。
-
What's 17 divided by 3 is roughly -- one point something, so one point dot, dot, dot, right?
7除以3大概是多少呢--1点几，所以是1点几，几，几，是不？
-
nano Well, anytime you run a program at the command line, like nano, you've almost always been putting one or more words nano hello c GCC hello c after that program's name; nano hello dot C, GCC hello dot C, and any number of MKDIR for make directory, and then peace at one or similar.
好的，任何时候在命令行中运行一个程序，就像，你几乎总是用1个或多个单词,在程序名的后面，许多的建立一个新的子目录，然后恢复平静。
-
So I've got one more piece of bad code on this point and this is buggy five dot c. So as a comment on top bug of this file challenges, what is, in fact, the bug.
所以我在这里得到了一块很烂的代码,这个是buggy5，c，所以作为这个文件顶端的注释,那实际上是那个。
-
Well it's a stupid looking program, but because I had more new line characters, and because I was using percent C, for individual characters, one per line, now I'm seeing dot slash ARG V2, well, now if I go ahead and rerun this with foo, I get this effect as well.
这是一个看起来很笨的程序，但是因为我有更多的新行代码，因为我使用的是%c，为单个字符使用的，每一行一个，现在我看到的是，/argv2，好的，现在如果我继续用foo返回它，我产生了这样的效果。
应用推荐