Martin Banks, a professor of optometry at Berkeley, says 3-D doesn't allow our eyes to follow the rules because we're focusing on things both far and near at the same time.
VOA: standard.2010.02.21
All laws are by definition just, he tells us, but it doesn't follow that all laws are by definition good.
所有的法律均是以公平和正义为界定的,但人们并不以此为据,而是以这部法律是“好“还是“不好“为界定。
If the soul is immaterial, doesn't it follow automatically, trivially, that the soul can't be destroyed by a material process?
如果灵魂是无形的,是否可以顺理成章地得出,灵魂无法被实体过程所摧毁呢
The reason I think it doesn't follow trivially is because, remember, I said we're dealing with interactionist dualism.
我认为它并非自然地得出结论的原因是,记住,我们在和心物交互二元论打交道
From the mere fact that they can't picture it from the inside, it doesn't follow that nobody believes they're ever in dreamless sleep.
仅从他们无法设身处地,想象这种情况这个事实,是无法得出没有人相信,自己能处于无梦睡眠的结论的。
Doesn't it follow that a soul, an immaterial entity, can't be destroyed by a material, physical process?
而灵魂这种,无形的实体,是否会遵循这个规律被物质,也就是物理过程摧毁呢
From the mere fact that you can't picture from the inside what it's like to be dead, it doesn't follow that nobody believes they're going to die.
仅从无法设身处地想象,死亡的感觉,不代表没人会相信自己会死。
But in fact, as a matter of logic, that doesn't follow at all.
但事实上,在逻辑学上,根本就不是那回事。
And of course even if in many cases, the engine continues to exist for a while, after the destruction of the car, certainly it doesn't follow the engine is immortal that continues to exist forever.
当然,即使在许多情况下,发动机在汽车毁坏后,能继续存在一段时间,但当然不能得出结论说,发动机是不朽的会永远存在下去。
It doesn't follow trivially.
或是自然而然得出结论
No, that certainly doesn't follow.
这么说肯定不对
If I can tell a story in which A exists and B doesn't exist, it's got to follow that A and B are not the same thing.
如果我跟你说A存在但B不存在,就可以得出结论A和B不是一个东西
应用推荐