Let's do selection and let's do merge sort here on the right just to see what actually happens.
中间进行选择排序,右边进行归并排序,看看会发生什么。
This is an interesting question: do they solve the moral hazard and adverse selection problem as well as banks do?
一个有意思的问题出现了,他们可以向银行那样,处理好道德风险以及逆向选择问题吗
How many swaps do I do in general in bubble sort, compared to selection source?
在冒泡排序中,一般要做多少次交换,对比选择排序呢?
An animal who has evolved a brain that says, "Take care of your offspring" will do much better from a natural selection point of view from an animal who has evolved a brain that says, "Eat your offspring."
逐步形成大脑的动物说,照顾你的后代“,好过从自然选择观点,看问题的动物说,吃掉你的后代“
I was just finding very tunnel vision-like, the smallest elements at that moment in time which means I don't know anything about the other elements other than they are not the smallest and so no matter what with Selection Sort I had to repeat this again and again and again and if you do out the math it's roughly N squared steps in the worst case as well.
我只有一个狭窄的视野,只知道某时刻的最小元素,就意味着我并不知道其他元素的任何情况,只知道它们不是最小的,所以不管怎样,在选择排序中,我就得一遍一遍地重复选择过程,在最坏情况下,大概需要N的平方次比较。
How many swaps do I do in selection sort?
那选择排序要做多少次交换呢?
What do I mean by adverse selection?
逆向选择是什么意思呢
应用推荐