But it is the case that they're dominated once we delete the dominated strategies: once we delete 67 and above.

但一旦我们剔除了原劣势策略,即选择67及大于67的数之后,他们才是劣势策略

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

and delete her voicemail messages so as that they could record more and listen to them all.

删除她的语音留言，这样他们就能记录更多，而且听到所有的语音。

新闻社的真实事件 - SpeakingMax英语口语达人

We can delete those strategies and once we delete those strategies, all that's left are choices 1 through 67.

我们可以剔除那些策略,一旦如此,剩下只有1到67的数

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

And this is because as you start writing--saving files to your hard drive, what happens is you might save this file here, then this one, then this one, then this one, but very reasonably you might go back eventually and delete this one.

这是因为当你开始对硬盘驱动器进行读写时,你可以保存一个文件到磁盘的某处，然后再一个，再一个，又一个，最后你可能回到这,并删除这一个文件。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

Once you delete the dominated strategies, then you kind of go through it again and then 2 is dominated by 3.

一旦你剔除了劣势策略,再次审视这个博弈时,立场2劣势于立场3

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

If we delete the strategies 1 and 10, which were dominated, then does 3 dominate 2?

如果我们剔除劣势策略1和10,那么策略3优于策略2吗

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Delete those lines of code and move them up to the top and problem solved.

把这几行代码删除，然后把它们放到,前面去，问题就解决了。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

So what Christine is arguing is, even though it's the case that 2 is not a dominated strategy, if we do the process of iterative deletion of dominated strategies and we delete the dominated strategies, then maybe we should look again and see if it's dominated now.

克里斯汀说的是,即使选择立场2不是劣势策略,如果我们迭代剔除劣势策略,然后我们剔除掉了劣势策略,然后再来回头看看还有没有劣势策略了

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So Christine is correct in saying that once we delete the strategies 1 and 10 once we realize that those positions are not going to be chosen by our sophisticated candidates then we realize that probably choosing 2 isn't a good idea either.

克里斯汀说的很对,一旦我们剔除了策略1和10,一旦我们意识到,不会有人选择这些立场时,我们会发现,选立场2或9可能也不是个好主意了

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Okay, so if we had stopped the class after the first week where all we learned to do was to delete dominated strategies, we'd be stuck, we'd have nothing to say about this game and as I said before, this is the most important game, so that would be bad news for Game Theory.

好了,如果我们只学了第一周的内容,即如果我们只学到了剔除劣势策略的话,我们没招了,我们无法解释这个博弈,但我之前说了,这是个很重要的博弈,这对博弈论来说可不是个好消息

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Try to identify all the dominated strategies of all players again, and then delete.

再次寻找所有,参与人的劣势策略,再剔除它们

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So we know that 2 is not dominated, and particularly not dominated by 3, When you delete the dominated strategy of 2 dominating 1, or 1 being dominated, when you delete that and 10, then it is.

我们知道选立场2并不是劣势策略,它并不劣于选立场3,当你剔除劣于策略2的劣势策略1,或者说立场1处于劣势,当你剔除策略1和10之后,2就变成劣势策略了

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

And then you can delete it once you're sure your code is working right.

当你们能够确定你们的代码运行正常的话，你们可以把这个“printf“,语句删除掉。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

I'm going to delete that arrow and actually draw s2 as pointing to this chunk of memory because whereas before this sequence of chars might have lived at address 71 or whatever, well, this one might live at 91.

我不会把那个箭头删除，实际上我画了s2作为,这块内存的指针，因为,这个字符序列存储在地址71或其它的地方，这个可能存储在91的地方。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选