Now noticed if that's the way we interpret his argument, harmony works no longer as a counterexample.

注意到如果这是,我们解读他论点的方式，和声就不再一个反例了。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

So there's not a counterexample, now that we interpret the relevant notion of invisibility as undetectibility.

所以就没有了反例，因为我们给出的无形这个词的解释,是无法检测。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Is this a counterexample to the utilitarian idea of calculating?

这算是功利主义计算思路的反例吗？

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

It's not really a counterexample to the personality theory.

不能作为一个人格理论的反例。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

If he could show us, he could convince us that harmony is not really invisible, then we would no longer have a counterexample to the claim that the invisible can't be destroyed.

如果他可以说服我们,和声并非无形，那我们就没有了,灵魂不可毁灭,这一论断的反例。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

There's no underlying David Smith personality still there, to have the counterexample or the example that we're after.

那里面没有潜在的David，Smith人格，来成为人格理论的反例或我们在寻找的例子。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选