Now, efficiency is obviously an important consideration when you're designing code, although I have to admit, at least for me, I usually want to at least start initially with code that works, and then worry about how I might go back and come up with more efficient implementation.

现在，当你设计程序的时候效率,是不得不考虑的问题，虽然我必须承认，至少对我来说,我是先担心程序能不能运行,再去把它的效率优化的,我喜欢可靠点的东西。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

So this code is identical functionally nonswitch c to the last implementation we saw, nonswitch.c, but I'm just ever-more emphatically saying, "In case 1," that is when n equals 1 -- or when case 2 applies -- when n equals 2 or when n equals 3 do what?

所以这些代码到最后的实现上，功能是,完全相同的，但是我想要再次强调一下，“在case，1“，那是当n等于1时1,或者当case，2适用-,当n等于2或者当n等于3，它将做什么？

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选