In fact,if you wanted to argue against, say,the Letter of Hebrews being included,you could say, "But all the people in the East don't accept the Letter of Hebrews as part of their canon,so we shouldn't,either."

实际上，如果你想反对，希伯来书被选上，你可以说，“但是东方的人都不承认希伯来书,属于他们的正典，所以我们也不应承认“

耶鲁公开课 - 新约课程节选

And you, you need not to be so ethically imperialist that you can't work with us to open up again the canon if you will of rights in the way we talk about it and to incorporate our perspectives."

而你们呢，你们需要摒弃,那种道德帝国主义态度，也就是,你们不愿跟我们合作,不愿敞开心扉,用我们的方式去理解人权,从我们的角度去看这个问题“

普林斯顿公开课 - 人性课程节选

In other words, doesn't historicism open the canon and indeed make the process of reading, the experience of reading, archival and omnivorous rather than canonical?

换言之，难道不是历史相对论破坏了标准,甚至让阅读的过程，阅读的经历，变得如档案般无所不包，而不是遵守规范？

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

Because we don't really consider Western Literature to have an actual closed canon of authoritative texts.

因为我们并不认为西方文学,具有权威文本的固定标准。

耶鲁公开课 - 新约课程节选

What's new in theory is the element of skepticism that literary criticism by and large which is usually affirming a canon of some sort doesn't reflect.

这新内容就是怀疑主义元素,它是文学评论,所不具备的,文学评论总是坚持某种原则。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

If you didn't accept Marcion's canon,his list, what was going to be your list?

如果你不接受马吉安的正典书目，那你的书目是什么？

耶鲁公开课 - 新约课程节选

But they don't have a set list of things that make something the canon.

但他们没有列出一系列东西,让它们成为正典。

耶鲁公开课 - 新约课程节选

So it didn't set the canon.

所以它没有在确定正典书目。

耶鲁公开课 - 新约课程节选