But it takes a special talent to play an invisible guitar.
VOA: special.2009.08.14
But, and this will be the crucial point, notice Socrates should have continued the soul is invisible in that sense.
但是,这一点很重要,注意苏格拉底应该在这个意思上,继续阐述灵魂是无形的。
Harmony is indeed invisible in sense Number 1, you cannot see it with your eyes, but for all that, it can be destroyed.
和声用无形的第一种解读方式理解,确实是无形的,你看不见它,但是它可以毁灭。
Let's call someting invisible not only it can't be seen, not only it can't be observed, but it can't be detected at all.
让我们把一些不仅是看不见的,不仅是观察不到的,而且是完全检测不到的,东西称为无形的。
but it's not invisible if we mean definition No. 2 can't be sensed. Can't be observed.
但如果取第二个定义它就不再无形2,无法感知,不能观察。
But if we give 4 while we read invisible as meaning utterly undetectable, it's no longer so clear to me that 5 we can give him 5.
但是如果我给出,把无形理解为完全检测不到,我认为,就不能给出。
They are invisible like the forms, but unlike the forms, they are destructable.
它们像形式那样无形,但是不同与形式的是它们可以毁灭。
But is it still invisible if by invisibility we mean can't be detected?
但是如果无形是指不能检测,灵魂还是不是无形呢?
But if invisible things can't be destroyed, the soul can't be destroyed.
但如果无形的东西不会毁灭,那灵魂就不会毁灭。
But maybe that's not what Socrates means by invisible.
但是这可能并非苏格拉底,所说的无形的意思。
They are not seen but aren't invisible.
你看不见他们,但是他们不是无形的。
Now the answer seems to me, the only answer I can imagine Socrates and Plato are giving at this point is to say, look, I need a different 3 definition of invisible, not 2 but 3.
我认为答案是,我所能想到的唯一答案是,在这点上苏格拉底和柏拉图,给出的答案是,我需要一个,无形的不同定义,不是2而是。
应用推荐