Some researchers and editors say changes must be made to stop such false author claims.
VOA: special.2009.10.08
Now,it turns out that that assumption, standardly built into the usual label,may be false.
现在似乎在通常标签下建立的,这个假设本身就是错误的。
Well, we'll talk about that, but the point here is they can be false.
我们以后会慢慢讨论,但关键在于它们是可以证伪的。
But the public was warned to be careful of false appeals.
VOA: special.2010.01.16
And if it is,all I can say is, again,it just seems to be false.
即便是这样,我还是能说,这看上去还是错的。
It can true,it can be false,and so on.
亦真亦假,虚无缥缈
All right, and initially, well, maybe initially, momentum just to be simple I'm going to start false momentum equal to false.
好了,首先,为了简单起见,我会让,先等于。
If you're not updating some variable by incrementing it or decrementing it -- if you're not changing anything, presumably the conditions are never going to evaluate to false or the opposite, so you're just going to have an infinite loop, which might be your goal, but odds are it's not.
如果你不通过增加或减少它来改变一些变量,-如果你不改变什么,大概那个条件永远不会变成错误的,或相反的,所以你将得到一个无限循环,那可能是你的目标,但可能也不是。
Specifically you'll see that the rationale for observing the Sabbath is different. God's name in Deuteronomy 5 is not to be used in a vain oath as opposed to a false oath. There are differences in the meaning.
你会发现两者对守安息日习俗的论述是特别不同的,《申命记》第五章的描述是,不可以妄称上帝的名,而不是不可以以上帝的名义作假誓,它们表达的意思。
This seems to me to be just patently false.
而我认为这显然是错误的。
But the point to think about for next time is just, is it really true that all three of the premises are true, or might one or more of them be false?
但下次要思考的关键是,那三个前提是否的确全部为真,或许一个或几个为假呢
The personality theory must be false.
这样一来人格理论一定是错误的了。
That would just be false.
那肯定是错的。
Unfortunately, this thought, popular as it may be, that it takes one to know one, just seems false.
不幸的是,这样的想法,即同类者互知,可能很流行,但实际上是错误的
And deception defined broadly is simply to act or be in some way that fools others into believing or thinking or responding to something that's false.
而广义上的欺骗是以愚弄的方式,使他人相信虚假之事,认为虚假之事是真实的,或是使他人对虚假之事做出反应。
It could be that even though the general claim, "It takes one to know one" Is false, the particular claim, "Eternal, non-physical can only be grasped by the eternal, non-physical," Maybe that particular claim is true.
即使一般来说,同类互知这个观点是错的,但它的特例,也就是永恒的非现实的东西只能被永恒的,非现实的东西所理解,这可能是对的
应用推荐