Levi praises the Obama Administration, and First Lady Michelle Obama, for trying to change eating and exercise habits.
VOA: standard.2010.07.02
Now I do want to go back to the relationship between Derrida and Levi-Strauss.
现在我想回到,德里达和列维,施特劳斯之间的关系。
for like clothing like Levi's and Zara's over that way.
比如Levi's和Zara就在那边。
But this very critique leveled against Levi-Strauss, he could have found in Levi-Strauss and does find it on other occasions.
但这个批判瞄准的是列维,斯特劳斯,他可以在列维,斯特劳斯的观点中找到,也的确在其他人的观点中找到。
This is what Levi-Strauss says in taken from one of Levi-Strauss' most famous books] The Raw and the Cooked.
然后德里达说,这是列维自己说的,引自列维斯最著名的著作之一],《生食与熟食》
Levi-Strauss is repudiating the father and, in repudiating the father, showing himself to fall into the very mythic pattern that Freud had been the first to analyze.
列维否认了父亲,在否认父亲的同时,也掉入了,弗洛伊德首创的神话分析模式。
So this is Levi-Strauss' argument, and Derrida is interested in it because he recognizes its affinity with his own hesitation in talking about events, births, emergence and so on.
这就是列维,施特劳斯的论点,而德里达对此感兴趣是因为他意识到它与自己的犹豫类同,他在谈论语言的发展,诞生和危机等东西时的犹豫。
Then, of course, he moved on to Paris where he knew Claude Levi-Strauss and influenced him and, ultimately, to the United States.
之后他去了巴黎,结识了列维,斯特劳斯并影响了他,最后,来到了美国。
Levi-Strauss writes: Whatever may have been the moment and the circumstances of its appearance in the scale of animal life, language could only have been born in one fell swoop.
列维,施特劳斯写道:,不论语言是何时何种环境下,在动物的历史中诞生的,语言只可能是一刹那间诞生。
Levi-Strauss' famous book, The Raw and the Cooked, essentially stages this critique in and of itself.
列维,斯特劳斯一本著名的书,《生食与熟食》,在它自己身上提出了对自己的批判。
It deploys and manipulates those gross constituent units of thought in the ways that we saw, but notice what Levi-Strauss is saying in that essay as opposed to the passage Derrida has just quoted.
它通过我们看到的方式来,调动和使用那些大构成单位,但请注意列维在这篇文章里所说的,与德里达引用的,形成了鲜明的对比。
So there is a certain pattern in--and of course, I invoke this pattern in arguing that Levi-Strauss's version of the Oedipus myth betrays his Oedipus complex in relation to Freud.
所以说,这里面的确有一个模式--当然,我在说明莱维-斯特劳斯所写的俄狄浦斯神话其实违背了,弗洛伊德的俄狄浦斯情节时引用了这一模式。
Again and again and again he quotes Levi-Strauss in confirmation of his own arguments, only then in a way to turn on him by pointing out that there is something even in what he's saying there that he hasn't quite thought through.
他一遍又一遍地引用列维,斯特劳斯的观点,来支持自己论点,在批驳其论点时也只是指出,他在某点上,考虑不够全面。
应用推荐