I know he would do the same if I was in that position, so I was purely driven by love and understanding that I can still live a normal life after this."
VOA: standard.2010.05.30
Just for sake of argument, we'll assume it's about there, and I do the same thing.
为了方便起见,我们假定就在这里,重复之前做的。
And then I go back and I start again, and I do the same thing.
跑完了一遍,它总是在最下面,然后我回来再做一次。
However,I do not think that you can expect any great new thunderbolts of just and fair elections because we still have the same machinery in place that has not been fixed at all."
VOA: standard.2009.10.28
And then I ask you do you think this's the same train as the train we pointed to before.
之后我问你,你认为这辆火车,和之前看到的是同一辆吗。
"And I only hope,and I express good wishes, that your friends and brothers in Nigeria,they will do us the same superb job that Egypt has done in the U-20, and they should do it in the Under-17, and it will be at the same level, the right African level."
VOA: standard.2009.10.22
This half, I'm gonna put my finger on the 1 and notice I can do the same thing.
这一半,指向1,注意到我可以做同样的比较。
If I'm anonymous, it's not me and I could do terrible things without feeling the same moral responsibility.
如果我是匿名的,那我就不是我了,我就能干坏事,而不用感到有道德责任。
Then, I pull it again by the same amount and let it go; I do it 10 times.
然后,我再用相同的力拉它,再放手,这样做 10 次
And then, they're proud of it and they insist that I, not inflict, but rather induce you, invite you to do the same thing.
然后,他们引以为豪并且坚持认为,我不是强迫,而是说服,邀请你去做同样一件事。
So any time I draw these molecular orbitals, I do my best, and I'm not always perfect, yet trying to make this energy different exactly the same for the anti-bonding orbital being raised, versus the bonding orbital being lowered.
所以我在画这些分子轨道的时候,虽然不是很完美,但我总是尽量,让反键轨道引起的,能量升高和成键轨道。
We'll come back and discuss it more in a second, but before I do, let me mention that the same model, exactly the same idea, has an application in Economics.
我们一会再深入导论这个问题,在此之前,我再来列举一个模型,是经济学里面一个完全类似的模型
Non-Western peoples who wish to share in the things that characterize modernity will need to study the ideas and history of Western civilization to achieve what they want, and westerners, I would argue, who wish to preserve these things must do the same.
希望分享西方现代特点的,非西方人士需要学习,西方文明的思想和历史,以实现自己的理想,而对西方,而我要说,那些希望,保留自身文明的西方人,也必须做相同的事
Where those pieces, I would do the same thing with, I would divide them up into smaller chunks, and sort those. Is that going to give me a more efficient algorithm?
合并起来,而那些小列表,我又会把他们拆成更小的列表,再排序,这会给我,一个更高效的算法么?
And maybe it does it kind of the same way that I do it but my computer doesn't have feelings in the same sense.
也许它做这些事情的方式和我是一样的,但我的电脑却并不能,像我一样,拥有情感
After all,he's got all the same memories,beliefs and desires that I do.
他和我拥有一样的记忆信仰和欲望。
So here I have a new expression for Firm 1's profit and I could do the same for Firm 2, but I'm not going too because it's... I'm getting bored.
这就是公司1的利润表达式,接下来我们算公司2的,我就不算了,太没有意思了
The format is the same. I'm going to ask for some input, and then I am going to use that procedure to check, is this the right type of value. And I'm trying to use that to do the coercion if you like. Same thing if it works, I'm going to skip that, if it not, it's going to throw the exception.
格式是一样的,我需要一些输入,然后我要用一个过程来检查,是否是正确的值,然后你就可以做强制转换了,如果能运行,那是一样的,我打算跳过这段,如果不正确,那就会抛出一个异常。
So what I do is I take the blocks and I put them back together building a tower, in the very same shape, in the very same structure, the very same order as the tower my son had built.
所以我就拿出积木,重新搭了一座塔,不管是形状,结构还是,积木的排列顺序,都和我儿子搭的一模一样。
What I'm gonna do is draw a larger table, the same basic structure: I'm choosing Alpha and Beta on the rows, my pair is choosing Alpha and Beta on the columns, but now I'm going to put both grades in.
我要画个结构相同的大表格,用列来表示我选α还是β,用行来表示我对手选α还是β,但我要把两人成绩写在一个单元格里
You're asking, "How much i and how much j do I need to build the same object?"
你们会问,"需要多少倍的 i 和多少倍的 j,来构成同一个矢量呢"
And then, if I want to find out if something's there, I do the same thing. But notice now, hash is converting the input into an integer.
然后,我想查找出某些元素是否在列表中,我做同样的事,但是现在注意,哈希是将输入转化成一个整数,所以,其思想是什么?
But I want to stress again, as long as I do the base case right and my inductive or recursive step reduces it to a smaller version of the same problem, the code will in fact converge and give me out an answer.
就开心的去做吧,但是我想再次强调,只要基础事件处理正确而我的递归,或递推步骤能把它简化为更简单的同类问题,那么这段代码就可以收敛。
Then I do the same thing on line two and I declare something called "y."
然后我在第二行做了同样的事情,我声明了“y“
Now I could go through again and do exactly the same thing for Player II, but I'm not going to do that because everything's symmetric.
如果我照此计算同理可得参与人II的,我就不算了,因为都是对称的
应用推荐