If that's true, it's true, again, what's being sold in markets, in many cases information products information services.

那样，同样地，市场中的商品，许多时候是,信息产品,信息服务。

麻省理工公开课 - 媒体、教育、市场课程节选

So again,we don't have any clear, true interpretation of the claim that nobody can take my place, even with regard to dying.

所以我们还是没有一个清晰的，真实的关于没人能取代我的诠释，更不用说死亡了。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

And if the condition is true, then it goes back and does it again.

如果条件成立，然后它回头再处理一次。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

So we're to assume we can get to any piece of data, any instruction in constant time, and the second assumption we're going to make is that the basic primitive steps take constant time, same amount of time to compute. Again, not completely true, but it's a good model, so arithmetic operations, comparisons, things of that sort, we're all going to assume are basically in that in that particular model.

因此如果我们假设在恒定的时间内,我们可以取得任何一块数据,任何一种数据结构的话,我们要做的第二个假设就是,基本的原始操作计算花费的时间是恒定的,这个假设也不是完全正确的，但这个模型其实挺不错的，因此算法操作，比较，这一类的事情，我们在这个特定的模型中都假设是基本的,操作，花费的时间是恒定相同的。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

Now again,that's an interesting claim if it's true.

这个说如果是真的，也会很有趣。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Once again, say, is that test true?

再一次的去看看测试结果不是为true？

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

Well,easy to imagine the fan of this view coming back yet again and saying, Although it's true that our hero takes the place of the other man on the guillotine, what ends up happening,of course,is that our hero dies his own death.

很容易想象这种观点的支持者会反驳说，虽然的确我们的主角是代替了别人上断头台，但结果还是他独自经历死亡。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选