v We don't know what it is yet. In order to change this from a p to a V, you have to use the chain rule. So let's use the chain rule.

为了把这里的p变成,我们需要利用链式法则,好，让我们使用链式法则。

麻省理工公开课 - 热力学与动力学课程节选

Remember, we don't do a one-to-one correlation, because p x and p y are some linear combination of the m plus 1 and m minus 1 orbital.

记住，我们不需要把它们一一对应，因为ｐｘ和ｐｙ轨道是,ｍ等于正负１轨道的线性组合。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

So the proposal that death is a matter of permanent cessation of P-functioning versus temporary, that doesn't seem like it's going to do the trick.

所以说死亡只永久地,停止人格功能性的这个说法，也不是正确的。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

pV=RT p plus a over v bar squared times v bar minus b equals r t. All right if you take a equal to zero, these are the two parameters, a and b. If you take those two equal to zero you have p v is equal to r t.

我们就回到,也就是理想气体,状态方程,下面我们来看看,这个方程。

麻省理工公开课 - 热力学与动力学课程节选

Texts that insist on a central sanctuary are probably Josiah's time or later. And there are many sections of P that don't seem to assume a central sanctuary.

一些章节坚持中心圣所,则可能在约西亚或之后时期，P资源中有很多部分,并没有呈现出一个中心圣所。

耶鲁公开课 - 旧约导论课程节选

It can't just be a matter of not P-functioning.

肯定不止和人格功能性有关。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

So that's true for a hydrogen atom, it doesn't matter if you're in a p or an s orbital, their energies are the same.

这对于氢原子来说是这样的，不论是p或，者s轨道，能量是一样的。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

We want a relationship in p-V space, not in T-V space. So we're going to have to do something about that. But first, it turns out that now we have this R over Cv.

我们想要p-V空间中的结果，而不是T-V空间中的,因此需要做一些变换，先来看现在的关系，它跟R/Cv有关。

麻省理工公开课 - 热力学与动力学课程节选

And this shows that G is written naturally as a function of T and p.

这表明G可以很自然的,写成T和p的函数。

麻省理工公开课 - 热力学与动力学课程节选

Adiabatic q equal to zero. It's also delta H 0 which is zero. The two didn't necessarily follow because remember, delta H is dq so p is only true for a reversible constant pressure process.

在这个过程中ΔH等于,绝热的所以q等于0，而ΔH也等于,这两个也不一定有因果关系,因为，记住，ΔH等于dq只有在恒压。

麻省理工公开课 - 热力学与动力学课程节选

But we haven't yet addressed why, for example, a 2 s orbital islower in energy than the 2 p orbital, or why, for example, a 3 s orbital is lower in energy than a 3 p, which in turn is lower than a 3 d orbital.

但是我们还没有强调为什么，举个例子一个2s轨道能量低于2p轨道,或者为什么，举例来说它依次低于3d轨道,屏蔽一个3s轨道的能量小于3p轨道。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

So if we don't have to hybridize one of the p orbitals, we can actually end up with a lower energy situation, because now these s p 2 orbitals are 1/3 s character, and only 2/3 p character, instead of 3/4.

我们的杂化轨道就有更多的p轨道成分，所以它们的能量更高，如果我们不杂化这个p轨道，我们可以得到一个能量更低的情况。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

But it doesn't actually cost as much energy as you might think, because in this s orbital here we have a paired electron situation where we're moving up to a p orbital where the electron is no longer paired, so it won't feel quite as much electron repulsion, but nonetheless, this is going to cost us energy.

但它消耗的并没有,你们想象的那么多,因为s轨道里我们电子是配对的,当我们把，电子移到p轨道,电子不再配对，所以它不会感受到那么多的电子排斥，但尽管如此，这个过程还是要消耗能量的。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

But we don't have a P-functioning body.

但这不是具有人类能力的肉体

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

All right, so one thing that I want to point out, which I said many, many times on Friday, and this is perhaps the last time I'll say it, but one last time is we can think about why we only see a line for the 2 p orbital, versus we don't see separate lines for a 2 p x, a 2 p y, and a 2 p z.

好的，我还要指出一个问题，这个问题我在上周五已经说了很多很多次了，这可能是我最后一次提到它，但是这最后一次让我们来考虑一下,为什么我们只看到了一条，对应于，2，p，轨道的线,而不是分别对应于，2，p，x，2，p，y，2，p，z，的线？

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选