Well, it looks like I just stole my own implementation Y but I happen to call it A and B, instead of X and Y, and so here, what's going on?
嗯,看起来我刚好像盗用了我自己的实现,我碰巧叫它为A和B,代替X和,这里,发生了什么事?
Cv The only difference is it'll be Cp instead of Cv, B but there it is for pathway B. There it is for C a pathway C. So the state functions that we're familiar with are doing what we expect they ought to be doing, right? If you go around in a cycle, starting and ending at the same place the state functions have to stay the same.
是Cp而不是,这是路径,这是路径,所以我们熟悉的态函数的行为,正与我们预期的相同,对吧?,如果你沿着循环走一圈,开始和结束于同一个位置。
应用推荐