Well, it looks like I just stole my own implementation Y but I happen to call it A and B, instead of X and Y, and so here, what's going on?

嗯，看起来我刚好像盗用了我自己的实现,我碰巧叫它为A和B，代替X和，这里，发生了什么事？

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

sb So in this case we would have 1 s a and 1 s b, and instead we would subtract one from the other, and what we would see is that instead of having additional, more wave function in the middle here, we've actually cancelled out the wave function and we end up with a node.

在这种情况下我们有1sa和，两者相减，我们可以看到不是在，中间有了额外更多的波函数，而是我们消掉了,波函数得到一个节点。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

Cv The only difference is it'll be Cp instead of Cv, B but there it is for pathway B. There it is for C a pathway C. So the state functions that we're familiar with are doing what we expect they ought to be doing, right? If you go around in a cycle, starting and ending at the same place the state functions have to stay the same.

是Cp而不是，这是路径,这是路径,所以我们熟悉的态函数的行为,正与我们预期的相同，对吧？,如果你沿着循环走一圈,开始和结束于同一个位置。

麻省理工公开课 - 热力学与动力学课程节选