And because there's nothing else in the code at that point, the program should just quit naturally in a good way. Yeah?

因为在那个阶段的没有其它的代码了，这个程序将以一种比较好的方式自然地退出，请说？

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

If you can read the code a year later, even code you wrote yourself, it's a good sign that you put good comments in, right?

如果你还能读懂1年前的代码，就算是你自己写的代码，这也说明了你放进去的注释,已经非常好了，对不对？

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

I will tell you that a good programmer, at least in my mind, may actually go back and modify the pseudo code as they realize they're missing things, but it's easier to do that when you're looking at a simple set of steps, than when you're in the middle of a pile of code.

至少我认为是这样的，如果他们发现遗漏了,一些步骤的话会,回过头去修改伪代码,但这当你面对一些大致的步骤时,这个过程就会比,面对一堆代码要简单的多。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

OK. Note, by the way, if I chase through each possible path, like there's some IFs in here, if there's some places to go, at least in this piece of code, every possible path through this code ends in a return. And that's a good programming discipline, to make sure that happens.

注意一下,如果我跟进每一条可能的路径，像是这里的，起码在这段代码中就有很多走向，这段代码中的每一条可能路径,在结尾都会返回一个值,这就是一条很好的编程定律，请确保这样做。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选