Derrida, as I said, believes in a kind of seamless web of discourse or discursivity. We are awash in discourse.
德里达,我说过,他相信有一种无缝的网,存在于论述或推论中,我们在论述中是处于同一水平线的。
and a lot of students like, offer, like, a good intellectual like, discourse.
通过和这些聪明的同学进行深度的交谈,我学到了很多。
Metaphor is the bringing together in a statement of identity of the discourse that's attempting to articulate itself.
比喻就是表述,试图自我阐明交谈特点的过程。
Foucault continues, Instead, these questions will be raised: "How, under what conditions, and in what forms can something like a subject appear in the order of discourse?
福柯继续说,取而代之的,这些问题会被问到:“哪种情况下,一个类似主题的东西会如何,以什么形式的话语顺序出现?
One of the reasons this understanding seems so problematic is the idea that we don't appeal to the authority of an author in making our mind about the nature of a given field of discourse.
这种理解之所以看起来有问题,一个原因就是我们不会为了弄清一个特定领域话语的本质,去诉求作者的权威。
Foucault couldn't possibly allow for that because plainly the whole texture of their discourse would be undermined by introducing the notion that it's okay to be a master, and yet Ricoeur feels that these figures dominate modern thought as masters.
福柯不会认同因为,这样的话他们话语的整个结构就会被破坏,如果引入可以作为大师的观点的话,同时,里克尔感觉这些人支配着现代大师的思想。
Sidney's talking about the various kinds of discourse: - divinity, hymnody, science, philosophy, history-- in other words, all the ways in which you can contribute to human betterment and human welfare. He says in the case of all but one of them, each discourse is a "serving science."
西德尼进行了很多方面的阐述:,神学,赞美诗,科学,哲学,历史-,换句话说,所有你能想到的,对人类福祉有益处的方式,他说这里面除了诗学,其他都是“服务性学科“
应用推荐