-
Romer appeared on Fox News Sunday. "When you get out five,10 years,they are assuming that real GDP [U.S.gross domestic product is only going to grow 2.2 or 2.3 percent a year,"
VOA: standard.2009.03.22
-
And what has happened in the last 2 or 3 years is that more foreign investment has started coming in.
在最近两三年,印度迎来了,更多的外资。
-
Where, you know, you might have a single family that is using up 2 or 3 stories of the same apartment.
一个家庭也许会用上同一幢公寓的二三层楼。
-
"Thus far,we have allocated over $620 billion of the Act, and as a result, the Recovery Act is responsible for somewhere between 2.3 and 2.8 million jobs that were either saved or created."
VOA: standard.2010.06.18
-
And so in theory after just 2 or 3 steps you were in order of magnitude farther along in this counting process than I would be because I'd still be on person literally 3 or 4.
因此从理论上说,经过这样短短的两三个步骤,你们就有了分级次序，比我数数快多了,因为我才数到第三四个人。
-
They expect 2 - 1 = 1 and when 2 - 1 = 2 or 3 or 0, they look longer, indicating surprise.
它们认为2-1=1,所以当2-1=2或3或0,他们注视时间更长,表明了惊奇
-
Well, I solve 2 or 3 exponential problems before breakfast every day. You know things like, how to find my way to the bathroom is inherently exponential, but I manage to solve it anyway.
你要知道如何找到,我的浴室就是一个，固有的指数型问题,但是我还是能解决它。
-
we're actually rebounding from Writers' Strike that happened 2 or 3 years ago.
我们其实已经从两三年前的作家罢工中复苏了。
-
And usually people will contact you within about 2 or 3 days.
一般人们都会在两三天内才会联系你的。
-
That's equal to seven minus six minus two 3 times 4.19, or 4.19 plus 2.3.
算出来是7-6-2*4。19的平方,或者4。19加2。
-
When we say that 2 + 2 = 4 or 2 + 3 = 5, we're saying something about numbers that our mind is able to grasp.
当我们说2+2=4或2+3=5时,我们是在讨论心灵可以掌握的数字
-
these pentose molecules, whether it's ribose or deoxyribose, the carbons are numbered the same 1', 2', 3', 4', 5', those are the five carbons that make up the pentose.
这些戊糖分子,不管是核糖还是脱氧核糖,碳都是从1'标注到5',也就是构成戊糖的5个碳原子
-
So we know that 2 is not dominated, and particularly not dominated by 3, When you delete the dominated strategy of 2 dominating 1, or 1 being dominated, when you delete that and 10, then it is.
我们知道选立场2并不是劣势策略,它并不劣于选立场3,当你剔除劣于策略2的劣势策略1,或者说立场1处于劣势,当你剔除策略1和10之后,2就变成劣势策略了
-
We're getting further away from the nucleus because we're jumping, for example, from the n equals 2 to the n equals 3 shell, or from the n equals 3 to the n equals 4 shell.
我们将会离原子核越来越远,因为我们在跃迁，比如从，n，等于，2，的壳层到n等于，3，的壳层，或者从，n，等于，3，的壳层到n等于，4，的壳层。
-
Typing the same commands again and again and again make can be configured, as you'll soon see in problem set 2 or 3 to do all these for you.
一遍又一遍地输入同样的命令,但是make却是可以配置的，你们很快就会看到,在习题集2，3中，我会演示给你们看。
-
s So this is the 1 s, you can look it up if you're interested 5s for the 2 s, or 3 s, or 5 s, or whatever you're curious about.
这是，如果你们感兴趣,你们可以找找2s或者3s或者，或者任何你感兴趣的轨道。
-
And when we make these comparisons, one thing I want to point out is that we need to keep the constant principle quantum number constant, so we're talking about a certain state, so we could talk about the n equals 2 state, or the n equals 3 state.
当我们做这些比较时，我想指出的一件事是,我们需要保持常量原则,保持量子数是常数，所以我们在讨论一个确定的态时，我们可以谈论n等于2的态，或者n等于3的态。
-
But we haven't yet addressed why, for example, a 2 s orbital islower in energy than the 2 p orbital, or why, for example, a 3 s orbital is lower in energy than a 3 p, which in turn is lower than a 3 d orbital.
但是我们还没有强调为什么，举个例子一个2s轨道能量低于2p轨道,或者为什么，举例来说它依次低于3d轨道,屏蔽一个3s轨道的能量小于3p轨道。
-
So this code is identical functionally nonswitch c to the last implementation we saw, nonswitch.c, but I'm just ever-more emphatically saying, "In case 1," that is when n equals 1 -- or when case 2 applies -- when n equals 2 or when n equals 3 do what?
所以这些代码到最后的实现上，功能是,完全相同的，但是我想要再次强调一下，“在case，1“，那是当n等于1时1,或者当case，2适用-,当n等于2或者当n等于3，它将做什么？
应用推荐