-
Well, both are foods, depending on your definition, but both are foods. Both have nutrients, both have things your body can make use of.
根据普遍的定义,两种都是食物,都是食物,都有营养素,都含有人类身体可吸收利用的物质
-
Calories go in, food gets consumed, the body metabolizes or makes use of those particular nutrients.
热量摄入,食物消耗,机体新陈代谢,即利用那些营养物质
-
The people who write about food history have called these things superfoods, not necessarily because they're super rich in all nutrients, but because they were super available.
那些写饮食史的人,将这些称之为超级食物,不一定是因为它们富含所有营养物质,而是因为它们随处可见
-
Because there are a lot more chemical-sounding things in that list of ingredients than there are things that nature would recognize or we would ordinarily recognize as food.
因为配料单里的很多东西,看上去更像化学成分,而不是我们通常认为的自然物质,或者常规意义上的食物
-
What he proposes is that we have become so precise about nutrients, and so concerned about the things that are in food, we've lost sense of what food is.
他认为我们越来越关注营养,关注存在于食物当中的物质,却忽略了食物本身
-
A nutrient is considered a substance within the food, that's when it digests it, absorbs, promotes some bodily function, so that it has some metabolic health value when people consume it.
营养素是包含在食物中的物质,由人体消化,吸收,推动身体机能,食品必须具有值得人类去代谢的健康价值
-
Most everybody understands the basic concept of what a calorie is: you eat food, it delivers something that can affect your weight, and that something is divided into units called calories.
大部分人所理解的基本定义是,人们吃食物,其中某些物质影响体重,这种物质划分为小单位后称之为卡路里
-
If we defined food differently: that it's something that nurtures the body, something found in nature, something that doesn't harm the environment-- there are a number of criteria one can apply to define a food-- then we might come up with a different definition than this, but this is the way the nutrition field generally looks at it.
如果我们给出不同的定义,滋养身体的物质,在自然界找到的物质,不会威胁到身体的物质,有很多标准可以拿出来定义食物,我们也许可以就此重新进行定义,但这就是营养学看待食物的方式
应用推荐