If I wanted to get full, real division, I should make one of them a float.

如果我想要得到真正的除法答案，我需要把他们之中的一个,变为浮点数类型。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

I really didn't know and I needed to have an answer to this question. So I created Star Festival with this team from MIT in order to try to answer this question.

我不知道，我需要一个答案,所以我和我来自麻省的团队,创造了，“七夕“项目,以回答这个问题。

麻省理工公开课 - 媒体、教育、市场课程节选

So the question I want to leave you with today and that I want to pick up again on Wednesday is, ? in the end, what do societies require more of?

所以我今天想留一个问题,下周二你们要得出一个答案，这个问题就是社会更需要什么？

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

So it's worth knowing in a general way what you need to do to earn a good grade in discussion section and here the answer is, perhaps the obvious one, you need to participate.

现在值得让你们知道什么是你们要做的,去得到好的分数在课堂讨论并且答案是，也许最显然的一个是，你需要去参与。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

And conceptually, the idea of cubing a value feels like you could package that up into a little box, a little tool that takes input, a value, and returns output the answer A* so you don't have to constantly do A star, A*A So this program ,at the end of today, is pretty much the same thing.

概念上，算一个值的立方就像是,你可以把一个值打包放在一个小盒子里,一个用来接收输入的工具,一个值，然后返回一个答案,所以你并不需要一直使用，等等。，A，star，，A，，and，so，forth。,这个程序，最后，是一个差不多的东西。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

Now the answer seems to me, the only answer I can imagine Socrates and Plato are giving at this point is to say, look, I need a different 3 definition of invisible, not 2 but 3.

我认为答案是，我所能想到的唯一答案是,在这点上苏格拉底和柏拉图,给出的答案是，我需要一个,无形的不同定义，不是2而是。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Well, one way of course is to accept the objection and say " "You're right Death isn't really bad for me " And some philosophers have indeed accepted that very conclusion, maybe Epicurus Most of us want to say " "No, no Death is bad for me" So we need a better answer to the ?" "Oh yeah? When is it bad for you?"

一种方式当然是接受它并说,“你是对的，死亡对我来说真的没什么坏处“,而一些哲学家确实接受了,那个结论，也许比如伊壁鸠鲁,我们大多数人想说,“不，不，死亡对我来说有坏处“,于是我们需要一个更好的答案来回答,“是么？，它什么时候对你有坏处了“

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选