We want to write a piece of code that helps these guys out, so I'm going to show you an example.
通过写一段代码,来解决一个这样的问题,接下来让我们来看个例子。
You're having a conversation about a relationship,
你想询问关于一段感情的问题。
The passage is: Here there is a sort of question, call it historical, of which we are only glimpsing today, the conception, the formation, the gestation, the labor.
这段话是:,有一个问题吧,关于历史的,我们今天只粗略地看看,它的设想,构成,妊娠,和分娩。
So we'd look broadly at the days and say we're doing a couple economic days, we gonna reserve this for economic issues.
我们可能就会广泛地看,比如这段日子处理经济问题,这段时间就会为经济问题预留。
And the first question I think that you have on the quiz here is the following: what keyboard instrument is playing here?
这里有个小测验,第一个问题是,这段音乐是用什么键盘乐器演奏的
And I think this is best illustrated by giving you a simple little piece of code.
我认为给你看一段简单的代码,可以很好的说明这个问题。
And they'd see this over and over again and the question is would they expect babies-- would babies expect the one to approach the one that helped it or approach the one that hindered it?
婴儿会反复观看这段影片,而问题在于,婴儿是希望进攻者持球,还是希望防守者持球
Think about that when you have your sections or when you talk about this text with your friends.
当你们在进行讨论时想一想这个问题,或是当你和友人谈论这段文章时。
The problem is that you get tired of doing math after a while, 100 years, 1,000 years, a million years, whatever it is.
问题是经过一段时间后你会厌倦数学,不管是一百年还是一百万年。
Here's another video clip from that same series that speaks to this issue, this one's beautifully done.
这儿是这个系列的另一段视频,也是围绕这个问题的,做的很完美
There were some problems with that deal and I just give you one news report on that, but you can follow it if you're interested.
那项交易里存在很多问题,而我仅仅给了你一段关于它新闻报道,不过如果你对此感兴趣你可以去追查一下
Okay. So let's--I'm going to ask them to queue the next piece here while we talk about that just for a moment.
我先问问题然后再放下面的一段乐曲,我们刚刚才谈到的
Now this is what Derrida is deliberately struggling with in this first paragraph: an "event" , if this loaded word did not entail a meaning thought to reduce or to suspect.
这就是德里达,在第一段着力解决的问题:,一个事件,加引号的,…,如果这个词的意思没有,减少或怀疑的意图。
These days we gonna focus on these issues.
这段时间我们处理这些问题。
You know his music from pieces such as "The Entertainer, " so let's play just a little bit of "The Entertainer" Very slowly, and my question to you is: where is the syncopation?
你可能听过他的作品比如《艺人》,那么,我们慢慢地弹奏一小段《艺人》,你们的问题就是切分音在哪里
So we're going to listen to a track out of John Kander's Chicago here, and the question that's at- in play at the moment is what's the meter of this cut from chicago?
我们先听一下约翰·肯德尔的作品芝加哥,中的一小段,边听边想一个问题,这个片段的节拍是怎样的,这个摘自芝加哥的片段
But I want to stress again, as long as I do the base case right and my inductive or recursive step reduces it to a smaller version of the same problem, the code will in fact converge and give me out an answer.
就开心的去做吧,但是我想再次强调,只要基础事件处理正确而我的递归,或递推步骤能把它简化为更简单的同类问题,那么这段代码就可以收敛。
The problem is in the second part they're throwing the rabbit at him but now he's okay.
问题是,在第二段影片中,他们是把小白兔扔过去的,不过,现在他已经不害怕了。
Let's start with a little bit of classical music here and this engages questions one and two.
让我们以一段古典音乐作为开头吧,结合一两个小问题
Imagine the sort of Heisenberg-esque problems we would get carefully following romantic couples over time and interfering with them to ask questions and make observations.
想想我们将遇到海登堡似的问题,在一段时间内,小心谨慎地跟踪情侣,干扰她们的生活,问问题,作观察。
In political philosophy it is never a sufficient answer to answer a question with a statement " "because Plato says so " " or "because Nietzsche says so."
对于政治哲学而言,答案永远都嫌不充足,无法仅用一段陈述来回答一个问题,“因为柏拉图如是说“,“因为尼采如是说“
应用推荐