The passage is also famous because in it Milton does something that he almost never does. Milton has made a mistake.
这篇文章有名也是因为弥尔顿做了一些,他几乎从未做过的事,弥尔顿犯了一个错误。
So just keep in mind, like we're talking about with the student, you can't be afraid of making mistakes
所以记住,就像我们对学生说的,你不能害怕犯错误,
And will make mistakes. And therefore, you write your programs so that catastrophes don't occur when those mistakes are made.
就是人是很愚蠢的,会犯错误的,因此,你要这样设计你的程序,以达到当犯错误时避免大事故的目的。
John Milton has made a mistake. He's made a literary mistake and, as I think all editors know, Spenser does not.
约翰·弥尔顿犯下了一个错误,他犯下了一个文学上的错误,而且我认为所有的编辑都知道,这个错误斯潘塞没犯过。
On the contrary, philosophy properly understood is what comes into being when one has achieved full recognition of a preexisting error.
相反,被适当地理解的哲学正是在,对前有的错误有了完整认知的时候所形成的。
So, if you want to attack urban air quality, this is probably moving in the wrong direction, OK?
所以如果你想攻击都市的空气质量,这可能是一个错误的方向,对吗?
I think one of the mistakes that I think you can make in a company is to build really close friendships.
我想在公司中人们可能会犯的一个错误是,建立非常亲密的友情。
People think, " Well, if I move-- especially in the day-light-- if I move to California, I'll be happier, right?" Wrong.
人们会想“如果我搬到-,尤其是在白天-,要是搬去加州,我会更快乐?“,错误。
A very old, very wrong view of evolution is that evolution has shaped animals such that they're merely survival machines.
非常古老错误的进化论观点认为,进化塑造了动物,他们只是幸存的机器。
Let's talk to the Beta's a second; let me just emphasize at this stage there are no wrong answers.
我们先来讨论一下选β的理由,我要强调一下这里没有错误的答案
Number one, the basic structure is that you have a pointer and it points over to a pointee, but the pointer and pointee are separate and the common error is to set up a pointer but to forget to give it a pointee.
第一,基本结构是,你有一个,指向数据的指针,但是那个指针和数据,是分开的,通常错误是声明了一个指针,但是没有指向一个数据。
And in the process of tidying it up and making it prettier, I'll often by accident find the bug.
让我的程序更漂亮些,在这个清理美化代码的过程中,我常常无意中发现我的错误。
Like Milton's Sin, Spenser's Errour is half woman, half serpent, and in a lot of ways she embodies the very problem of religious error.
像弥尔顿笔下的罪恶之神,斯潘塞笔下的“错误“是一位,一半女人一半毒蛇的怪物,她从各个方面具体化了宗教错误。
Well, it is the disclosure of error that other forms of discourse supposing themselves to refer to things remain unaware of.
好的,这揭露了一种错误,也就是,其它文体假设自己指出了其它一些人们从未意识到的问题。
Edith, a reader of sublime simplicity, as de Man says, misinterprets the rhetorical question as a grammatical question: "What is the difference? I'm curious to know."
而依迪斯一个极端天真的读者,正如德曼所说,错误地将这个修辞问句理解成一个语法型问句:,“区别在哪里呢,我想知道“
The exception is right there. It's an index error, that is it's trying to do something going beyond the range of what this thing could deal with.
但他事实上抛出一个异常,异常就在这里,这是一个下标错误,它是试图去取超出范围的元素造成的。
A lot rests on it, but as Crick points out; the scientific consensus now is that dualism is wrong.
很多人都信奉它,但正如克里克所指出的,如今的科学共识认为二元论是错误的
They misattribute that, what might be anger, what might even be aggression and violence, to an expression of love.
他们错误地把,可能的愤怒,侵犯或暴力,解释为爱。
So you say well, rather than rushing off and fixing this one bug, let me pull back and ask, bug is this a systematic mistake that I've made throughout the program?
因此我们应该回头想想,这是不是我在整个程序中都,在犯的一个系统性错误,而不是匆匆忙忙的去修复这一个,如果确实是系统性错误的话?
And then of course, once we figure out why not, we try and fix it. but today I'm going to emphasize not how do you fix it, but how do you find out what's wrong.
我们就会去尝试着修复程序,但是今天我强调的,并不是怎么去修复,而是怎么找出来错误原因。
Because it says, your program will still give you a value, but it may not be what you intended, and you can't always tell, and that may propagate it's way down through a whole bunch of other computations before it causes some catastrophic failure.
因为这意味着,你的程序依然会返回一个值,但是这个值可能不是你想要的,你可能还分辨不出来,而且这种情况会传播,结果会沿着正果计算过程传播下去,直到产生一个灾难性的错误。
He can't even bring himself to say, "Thus he relates, erring," so powerful is this defense against Homer.
他就不能说“因此有关他的,都是错误“,这对于荷马的抵触是这样的强烈。
If you're getting these compilation errors, well, -- when you compile, notice there's a number of key help -- the number of helpful tidbits here.
如果你们得到了这些编译错误,当你编译的时候,注意这里有很多关键帮助-,这里很多帮助信息。
You don't need this hack of just, like, manually adding a decimal point just to fix that problem.
你不需要这样来操作,比如,手动地加入小数点来修正这个错误。
OK. What happens if you actually have something that's both syntactically correct, and appears to have correct static semantics, and you run it?
好,当你的代码语法,没错误,并且也有正确的静态语义,你去运行它的时候会发生什么呢?
Children make grammatical mistakes all the time but then they go away and they go away without correction.
儿童们总是会犯些语法错误,但随后这些错误无需纠正也都消失了
Not because you made one or two and they mated and produced many more bugs.
并不是因为你只犯了一两个错误,然后这些错误结婚了。
I've certainly written code that has this problem, I've tried to use my own code that has this problem, and good to us, right, good hygiene, I'm going to use that word again here, of getting into the habit of writing defensive code up front, it's part of that collection of things that you ought to do is a great thing to do.
我举手了吧?,我当然写过犯这种错误的程序了,我也尝试过应用含有这种错误的代码,不错,好的卫生,我还是要用这个词,对我们有帮助,养成写防卫性,代码的好习惯,是你应该做的,一系列事情之一,也是我们日后要做的主要的事情。
I think what I want to do-- And sometimes that explanation is accurate, but the ones that are interesting here are the ones where you misattribute the cause of the arousal-- you make a mistake and think it's love when it might be due to something else.
我想做的是-,有时你的解释是正确的,但是有趣的解释是,是那些你犯了张冠李戴的错误-,你错误了认为是爱,而实际可能是其他的原因。
应用推荐