Ok, double line. If there are no questions I'm going to make a dramatic change in topic.
好的,这是重点,如果没什么问题,我要讲下面的内容。
That's not the end of the story. The question really is, so now we know that, what kind of relations did they have?
这不是重点,真正的问题是,它们之间的关系到底是什么
So here is one of the interesting takeaways, a char, we've already spoiled this answer, takes up how many bits.
关于char还有一个重点:一个char占据多大内存,这个问题我们已经翻来覆去说了好多遍了。
But in keeping with the focus of our discussion about the badness of death, I want to put aside the moral question ? and think about how good or bad for me ? is it that there's variability in death?
但是为了重点讨论,死亡的坏处,我要撇开道德问题不谈,转而考虑这种情况对我是好是坏,如果死亡有可变性的话?
More fundamentally, I want to get back to what I think of as the main theme of 6.00, which is taking a problem and finding some way to formulate the problem so that we can use computing to help us get an answer.
花一些时间来讲,更重要的是我想,回到我认为的6。00的重点,即处理问题并公式化问题,从而使我们能够靠电脑得出答案。
And the question posed by the Republic, in many ways, the question around which the book as a whole gravitates, is whether this thumotic quality can be controlled.
而《理想国》所提呈的问题,在很多方面,这些整本书,重点环绕的问题,是这些,Thumos,特质是否能受控制。
应用推荐