That's not the end of the story. The question really is, so now we know that, what kind of relations did they have?

这不是重点,真正的问题是,它们之间的关系到底是什么

耶鲁公开课 - 古希腊历史简介课程节选

So what's the point here?

那么重点是什么呢

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

What's the point? Again, you can have things that are syntactically legal but not semantically meaningful, and static semantics is going to be a way of helping us decide what expressions, what pieces of code, actually have real meaning to it. All right?

重点是什么？重申，你可以有东西在语义结构的逻辑上有意义,但是在语义上无意义，而static语义,将是一个帮助我们,决定哪些表达，哪部分的代码实际上，有意义的途径，好么？

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

I circled this P -if any of you have taken statistics will know what that means, but it's the statistical term that tells you how significant these findings are.

我重点圈起了P,学过统计学的就知道这是什么意思,这是统计学的术语,它告诉我们,这些数据的重要程度

耶鲁公开课 - 关于食物的心理学、生物学和政治学课程节选