But first let's worry about the point that I was emphasizing earlier, namely, even if the soul is not very much like harmony, so what?
但首先让我们探讨一下,我之前强调的那一点,那就是即使灵魂和和声大为不同,那又如何?
That's to your art, to your enjoy the moment of creativity So, what Welles is really espousing is the goodness of being alive and being creative.
这些对你来说是艺术,是享受,创造性的一刻,那又如何呢,威尔斯真正提倡的,是活着,并充满创造力。
If Plato is a fascist, ? what does that make you?
如果柏拉图是一名法西斯份子,那你们又该如何自称?
Even if quantum mechanics was wrong and somehow, you know, at the macro level all the indeterminism boils out-- whatever-- and at the macro level we are deterministic systems, so what?
即便量子力学是错的,而且不知怎的,在宏观水平上,所有的非决定性都蒸发了,不管发生了什么,在宏观水平上我们都成了决定论的系统,那又如何
What about life? What about military conscription?
譬如生命,譬如征兵制,那又如何?
If harmony really is invisible, and harmony really can be destroyed, that invisible things can be destroyed, even the soul is nothing like you know, that's not a good analogy for thinking of the physicalist position, have you? So what?
如果和声真的无形,而和声真的可以毁灭,那么无形的东西可以毁灭,即使灵魂不同于和声,如果从物理学家的观点来看,这不是个好的类比,那又如何?
So what?
那又如何
应用推荐