Gadamer says, and here again he's attacking historicism: The text that is understood historically is forced to abandon its claim that it is uttering something true.
伽达默尔在攻击历史相对主义时这样说道:,文本如果放在历史的角度理解,那么这样的理解肯定不是绝对正确的。
So if that was all that was happening then an embryo would just be many, many cells that are all identical and you know that's not the case.
但如果仅是这样,那么胚胎就只有,许多一模一样的细胞,但实际不是这样
Suppose you are interested in investing in debt of companies, then you as an investor are subject to the problem that you might end up with the worst stuff if you don't watch out.
假设你有兴趣投资于公司债权,那么作为投资人你会面临这样一个问题,如果不谨慎,投资有可能会血本无归
Yeah, if you immediately said, "Well, if the vector is , then the vector looks like this.", you're making the assumption that I am writing the vector in terms of i and j.
对,如果你紧接着就说," 如果一个矢量是,那么它就像这样 ",你其实就是假设了,我是按 i 和 j 分量的形式写的这个矢量
So, the optimal thing to do if you live in a world like this n is to get n as large possible and you can reduce the standard deviation of the portfolio very much and there's no cost in terms of expected return.
如果现实中也这样简单的话,那么你就尽量增大,这样就能让投资组合的标准差,就会大大降低,从预期收益率的角度来看,这样做的成本是零。
应用推荐