Thank you. Nice catch too by the way. All right, so now that you can see that I can screw up programming, which I just did.
但是我们在半路中发现并修复了,谢谢你,那么我们做了什么呢?,我们现在学习了收集东西的一种方式。
you'll find... you'll find a lot of people who are not that stereotype
你会发现……许多会计师没那么刻板,
Then if you adjust for survivorship bias, you end up concluding that the deficit wasn't .3% but the deficit was actually 2%.
那么如果你算上生存偏差,你会发现,缺口不是0.3%,事实上是2%
So if you find yourself getting most of these answers correct, then don't take this course.
因此如果你发现你能够答对大部分问题,那么就没必要上这门课了
Once you get that, once you get the value, "Christmas tree," as opposed to "red lights," "red lights" being perhaps a part of some Christmas trees, then you see that you're back in a semiotic system and a very obvious one, because a Christmas tree is a not-menorah, not-Kwanzaa candles.
一旦认识到这点,红灯,指的其实是圣诞树“,红灯是圣诞树的一部分,那么你会发现你回到了符号学的解释中,圣诞树不用于犹太教或者非洲人的节日。
Now, should you be proud when you find a bug?
好,那么当你发现一个bug的时候?
Often a good thing to start with is to put the lowest ionization energy atom in the middle, and if you don't have charge separation then go with that structure, but if you do find you have a lot of separation, such as the case in negative 2, positive 2, and minus 1, then you want to say wait a second, this is really bad in terms of formal charge, let me go ahead and see what other options I have here.
通常一开始把电离能最低的原子,放在中心位置就很好了,如果你发现电荷没有分开,那么这个结构就没问题了,但是如果你发现有很多分开的电荷,比如这种情况,有负二,正二和负一,那么你会想要说等一下,从形式电荷来看这很不好,让我去看看其它可能的选择。
Conversely, if you get an answer and it doesn't seem to make sense, then you've got to go back and ask, am I violating some of the assumptions, and here you will find the assumption that the particle had that acceleration a is true as long it's freely falling under gravity but not when you hit the ground.
反过来说,如果你得到一个结果,发现似乎是错的,那么你就应该回过头来问问自己,我是不是违反某些前提了,这个模型中,你就发现,只要质点在重力作用下自由下落,质点具有加速度a的前提是正确的,但是落地后就不成立了
So, given the set-up, you kind of feel what you're missing, you know, what this home pitch is-- the pitch to which you are gravitating.
那么,根据规律,你发现缺点了什么,基本的音高是,那个吸引你的音高
So if we're comparing the difference between these 2 now, what you'll notice is that in nitrogen we have all half-filled 2 p orbitals, and now, once we move into oxygen, we actually have to add 1 more electron into 1 of the 2 p orbitals.
那么如果我们来比较下它们两个有什么不同,你会发现氮的,2,p,轨道,都是半满的,现在,我们继续看一下氧,我们不得不在其中一个,2,p,轨道上,再放上一个电子。
应用推荐