Now, by that logic the next two steps are pretty much the same.

现在，根据那个逻辑，下两个步骤几乎是一样的。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

If you have a dog and you say "Good dog" to reward the dog, by your logic, which is right, at some point you might as well give the dog a treat along with the "Good dog."

如果你有只狗,你用“好狗狗“这话来奖励它，根据你正确的逻辑，总有时候你会在说“好狗狗“的同时,给它些奖励“

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

And that's why in Genesis 9:6 we read, "Whoever sheds the blood of man, In exchange for that man shall his blood be shed, For in the image of God was man created" 1 invoke that rationale from Genesis 1 in the absolute prohibition on murder.

因此我们会在《创世纪》第9章第6节中读到，“那些让人类流血的人，他们必须用自己的血液来偿还，因为人类是依照上帝的形象所创造“,在《创世纪》第一章中，它们便提供了逻辑根据1,杀生是绝对被禁止的。

耶鲁公开课 - 旧约导论课程节选

So supposed that I give you 16 elements to sort, well, following the logic before, the running time involved in sorting 16 elements is gonna be twice the running time 16 of sorting 8 elements, left half and right half plus 16 - and again, a little sanity check, 16 means-- just the merge steps, right?

现在要对16个元素进行排序，根据之前的逻辑，对16个元素排序,要花的时间是对8个元素排序所花时间的,2倍，分别用于左半部分和右半部分，再加上6,这里16是-,做合并的步数，对吗？

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选