What can I conclude, now I've concluded that the strategies 68 through 100 essentially don't exist or have been deleted.
目前为止我们能得到什么结论,68到100的选项不存在了,或者说已经被剔除了
It's really as if the game is being played where the only choices available on the table are 1 through 67.
就如同这游戏的可选项只有,1到67之间的数字了
OK. Having done this now, I can simply go ahead and run this, and in fact if I go up here to run, you'll see I've got both an option to check the module, though in this case I'm just going to run it.
好,讲完了这些,我可以去执行程序了,实际上如果我在这里运行,你们会看到我同样得到了,一个可以同时检查模块的选项,虽然在这个例子中我就是直接去运行程序了。
Maybe the disregard option just is one that we can't actually take on as an intellectually acceptable alternative.
也许选择无视只是一个,我们不能作为理性上可接受选项的选择。
So we have four choices in terms of initial and final energy levels, and also what it means - in terms of the electron -- whether it's gaining energy or whether it's going to be emitting energy?
我们有这四个选项,各有不同的初始能量和末能量,它都是按照电子来说的,不管是失去能量还是得到能量?
So this is what he asked them to do: Select four answers to the question 'What should a reader be to be a good reader?' "The reader should belong to a book club."
这就是他要求学生们做的:,从以下四个选项中选取问题,“读者如何才能成为好读者”的答案:,“读者应该是书友会的成员“
And then people see what would have happened if they would have chosen the other option.
然后他就会看到,选择其他选项会挣到多少。
You confirm your selection after you click on it.
选择后确认选项
I just wanted to get her on the subway and she, too, she did mention I want a round trip, she wants to be able to come back from Park Street Station so where is the option that just says one way or round trip?
我只想让她乘上地铁,她也是,她提到她想要一个环形旅行,她想,从Park,Street地铁站返回,但是哪里有一个选项,来说明是一个单线的还是环线的?
oh, it's kind of hard to compare case 2 and 3 when we can't see it anymore.
噢,我们不太好比较第二和第三选项3,这里看不清了。
That seems to me to be the least unattractive of the options we've got available.
我认为这似乎不是最没吸引力的选项。
Then they saw this word "choose", they can choose one of these options.
受试者在看到“选择“之后,会在三个选项中选出一个。
But that does seem to be the least unacceptable of the options.
但那似乎是最容易接受的选项了。
There will be an option when you pull up the tab for this particular course if you go to the course website and that will link you right to the course website.
当你们点击课程标签时,有个登陆这门课网站的选项,那个链接可以转到课程网页
And then I think it looks like most people understood that four was not a possibility.
然后我认为,大多数人是理解第4个选项,是不可能。
Well then,what's the alternative?
那么选项二呢?
Then also you'll be asked to do identifying information if you print it out from the program itself, but if you go up to your web browser print option and print from that particular thing then you can do it and no identifying information will be necessary.
如果你想直接从网上打印分析结果,就得提供个人信息,但是,如果你用浏览器中的打印选项,只打印营养分析结果,你就可以打印文件而无需提交个人信息
In this blank area over here next to the search tab you can type in any food that you're having, and then the program, unless it's something really unusual, the program will recognize it and then give you a series of options of things it thinks it might be.
你可以在搜索框的空白处,输入你吃的食物,之后程序会,除非是些稀奇古怪的东西,否则程序会去识别输入的内容,并给你一系列它认为可能的选项
Good, so even if everyone in the number-- everyone in the room didn't choose randomly but they all chose a 100, a very unlikely circumstance, but even if everyone had chosen 100, the highest, the average, sorry, the highest two-thirds of the average could possibly be is 66 2/3, hence 67 would be a pretty good choice in that case.
好的,如果每个人,教室里的每个人不是随机选择数字,而是全选了100,这好像不太可能,但如果每个人真的都选了100,就是最大的书,那平均数,抱歉,平均数的2/3会是66又2/3,此情况下67应该是个不错的选项
But other people, in fact probably a larger percentage, default to the top option here: that these are personal health issues rather then public health issues; that people are making choices about what they eat, if they make bad choices it's their fault.
不过另一些人,确切说是很大一部分人,把问题归咎于以上几个选项,这是个人健康问题而不是公共健康问题,人们自由选择想吃的东西,即使做了不正确的选择也是他们自己的错
But how carefully you estimate will determine in part how good your ultimate records are so please try to be as careful as you can, and then pick the closest option if you can't find the exact food that you're eating at that time.
你估计的仔细程度,在某种程度上,也会决定最终结果的准确性,所以请尽可能谨慎,如果找不到完全对应的食物,请选择和你当时所吃食物最接近的选项
Then what the program will do will give you a series of things it might potentially be because it recognizes that you could be entering more than one thing, and then you have to take the one that you think is closest to what you're actually eating.
系统就会给你,一系列它认为正确的选项,因为它可能会认为你的东西不止一种,之后你要选择,与你所吃食品最接近的选项
p All right, then what? 2 p. After that? 3 s. Next? 3 p, that gives us five different options, five different orbitals, five different energies right there.
好,然后呢?2,p,继续?3,s,下一个?,我们有五个不同的选项,五个不同的轨道,五个不同的能量在这。
One would be a low fat diet; one would be a low carb diet like Atkins; another would be just a low calorie diet; and then choice D is they all stink.
有的主张低脂饮食,有的主张低碳水化合物饮食,如阿特金斯饮食法,还有的主张低卡路里饮食,选项D则是都不可取
How many would vote for choice C here?
多少人投票给选项C
应用推荐