• Alex is going to get all the left wing votes, but there aren't enough left wing votes here, right?

    亚历克斯将获得他左边左派的选票,但不是所有的左派选票,对吗

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • What we have right now is low voter turnout, but the votes count

    我们现在的问题是参与投票的人数较少,但每一张选票都是有意义的。

    对于义务投票制 - SpeakingMax英语口语达人

  • I get all the voters right on top of me at position 1 and she gets everyone else, is that right?

    我得到选择立场1的10%选票,对手得到剩余90%的选票,对吗

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • The usual structure is one shareholder, one vote.

    常见的结构是一位股东一张选票

    耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

  • The fact that I have one, you know, five hundred thousandth of the vote for one representative in congress is not the same thing as my having the ability to decide for myself how to use my property rights.

    事实是,我只有一张选票,50万选民才票选出,一位国会议员,这与我能自己决定如何行使我的财产权,是两回事。

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • because they are votes that mean something to the people that cast them.

    因为这些选票是选民仔细考虑后投下的。

    对于义务投票制 - SpeakingMax英语口语达人

  • The payoff of 2 against 3 is all the people at 1, all the people at 2, so it's 20%.

    如果对手选3而我选2我会得到,立场1和2的全部选票,一共20%

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • I'm going to get all the people at position 1 and half the people at position 2 for a total of 15.

    我会获得所有立场1的选票,和立场2一半的选票,就是15%

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • In the former case if I choose 1 against 4, how many votes do I get?

    如果我选立场1对手选立场4,我会获得多少选票

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • So Stacy's going to pick up the right wing votes, she's going to split.

    斯泰西会拿到些右派的选票,她会分得

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • It means that choosing position 2 always gives me a higher share of the vote than choosing position 1, no matter where the other candidate positions herself.

    意味着选择立场2,会比选择立场1,获得更多的选票,无论另一个候选人如何选择

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • But you'll see that very clearly that Steven's right: that choosing 2 will always get me 5% more of the votes than choosing 1 from here on down.

    你会发现斯蒂文说的很对,从这里开始,选立场2总会比,选立场1多获得5%选票

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • And remember the voters are still there: we're just deleting the strategies.

    但要记住选票还在,我们仅仅剔除了这些策略

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • He will get or she will get all the voters at 1.

    对手会得到立场1的选票

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • Exactly, so ignoring these first two positions which were a bit weird, choosing 2 always gave me 5% more votes than choosing 1, regardless of what the other person chooses.

    完全正确,所以忽略前两个立场,因为前两个立场有点古怪,我们选立场2总比1多获得5%的选票,无论对手如何选择

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • There's another vote hidden behind there, I didn't see you.

    那后面还有一张选票,我没有看到

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • If there's a tie then the voters split.

    出现平局时选票会分摊

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • And if I chose 2 against 3, what do I get? I get 20, I get all the people at 1 and I get all the people 2, so I get 20%, so we're okay again.

    如果我选立场2他选立场3,我会得到20%的选票,立场1和立场2的选票都归我,所以是20%,大家都明白了吧

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • The voters are still there.

    但是选票还是这样分布的

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • From here on down, if I bothered to do it, we'd find that choosing 3 always gets me 5% more of the vote than I would have had from choosing 2, against any of these higher numbers.

    如果我不怕麻烦 我能一直这么写下去,我们发现选择立场3总是比选择立场2,使我多获得5%的选票,在对手选更靠后的立场的情况下

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • Notably, it's typically required that it's one share, one vote and that there's it would be also required that there be an annual meeting-- at least once a year, a shareholder meeting-- and then the shareholders can vote on relevant issues.

    还有些一般性条款,如一份股票代表一张选票,还比如年度会议,每年至少有一次股东会议,股东可以对相关议题进行投票

    耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

  • So the total sum of right wing votes is going to beat out half of the left wing votes.

    所有右派选票将,战胜左派选票的一半

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • And here if I choose 2 against 4, I get all the people at 1, all the people at 2, and what?

    如果我选2她选4呢,我会得到立场1和2的选票

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • So what's my--somebody can shout this out-- what's my share of the vote if I choose 1 and the other candidate chooses 1?

    有人能说一下吗,如果我们都选择立场1时,我能获得多少选票

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • So 2 against 1 gives me 90% of the votes, 3 against 1 gives me what?

    我选立场2他选1,我得90%选票,要是我选立场3对手选1呢

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • Claire Elise is going to win all of the right wing votes, ranging from crazy to moderate, and these guys are going to split the left wing votes.

    克莱尔·伊莉斯将要赢得所有的右派选票,从疯狂的到温和的,而他们俩将平分左派的选票

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • Beatrice is going to get all of these right wing votes.

    比阿特丽斯将获得所有的右派选票

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • So, in particular, let's start working out what share of the votes you'd get if you chose position 1 or position 2, against different positions the other guy can choose.

    先来看看如果你选择立场1和2,在你对手选择不同立场时,你分别能获得多少选票

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • So the payoff from choosing 2 against 2 is 50%.

    如果双方都选立场2则各得50%选票

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • The payoff from choosing 3 against 4 is going to be all the people at 1, all the people at 2, and all the people at 3, for a total of 30%, which again is bigger.

    当对手选4我选3的收益,就是立场1的选票,加上立场2和立场3的选票,一共是30%,立场3收益更多

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定