• The reason I chose Alpha, regardless of what my partner chose, I think there would be better outcomes than choosing Beta.

    α是因为不管我对手什么,我α得到的成绩总会β的要好

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • If your opponent doesn't choose 1 or 2, then you're always going to be 5% better off if you choose 2 than 1.

    如果你的对手不1立场或者2,你择立场2总会择,立场1多得到5%的

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • If the pair chooses Beta, then if she chooses Alpha she gets 3, Beta she gets 1, and 3 is bigger than 1.

    如果她对手β,她α得到3,她β得到1,3也1大

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • So I should choose Beta: 1 is bigger than 0, i should choose Beta.

    因此我该β,10大,我应该β

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • We mean that if these are your payoffs, no matter what your pair does, you attain a higher payoff from choosing Alpha, than you do from choosing Beta.

    我们说如果这是你的收益,那么不论你的对手什么,你择α总会择β,得到更好的收益

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • But you'll see that very clearly that Steven's right: that choosing 2 will always get me 5% more of the votes than choosing 1 from here on down.

    你会发现斯蒂文说的很对,从这里开始,立场2总会,立场1多获得5%

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • How many of you, excluding the people who chose 1 last time, how many of you chose a number that was lower than the number you chose last time?

    出了上次1的人,多少人你,上次择的数还低的数字

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • Again Alpha is better. For my opponent, alpha dominates Beta.

    α还是β好,对我对手来说,α优于β

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • Exactly, so ignoring these first two positions which were a bit weird, choosing 2 always gave me 5% more votes than choosing 1, regardless of what the other person chooses.

    完全正确,所以忽略前两个立场,因为前两个立场有点古怪,我们立场2总1多获得5%的票,无论对手如何

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • So as before, Alpha does better than Beta for me.

    和从前一样,对我来说αβ好

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • In particular, if the other candidate were to choose position 1, I would get a higher share of the vote choosing 2 than I would have done if I had chosen 3.

    如果对手择立场1,我立场2会立场3,得到更多的票数

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • In fact, we could check that if the attacker attacks through the easy pass, not surprisingly, you do better if you defend the easy pass than the hard pass: 1 versus 0.

    我们来分析一下,如果入侵者择平坦之途,毫无疑问,如果你平坦之途要崎岖之途更好,10

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • You will always get a higher payoff from choosing 67, at least as high and sometimes higher, than the payoff you would have got, had you chosen 80, no matter what else happened in the room.

    择67的话你总会获得较好的收益,至少也是跟80的收益一样高,有时候80的收益更高,不管别人择的是什么样的策略

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • Top is better than bottom against left -- sorry, bottom is better than top against left because 6 is bigger than 5, but top is better than bottom against center because 11 is bigger than 0.

    在左列下,下,我说错了,在左列下上要好,因为6大于5,但在中列下,下好,因为11大于0

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • So almost all of you came down.

    几乎所有的人都上一次低

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • Because I thought everyone was going to be around like the 45 range because 66 is two-thirds, or right around of 100, and they were going to go two-thirds less than that and I did one less than that one.

    因为我想每个人都会45左右的数,因为66约等于一百的2/3,而大家会选比那小的,我就了更小的数

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • Similarly, we can see that Right is not dominated, because it does better against Up, than does Left.

    类似的,我们也得出右也不是劣势策略,因为参与人I上时,左好

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • It's more likely than Y the probability that they're going to choose right is more than Y, then the highest line of these three is this one, which corresponds to my choosing Middle.

    Y大,也就说对手右的概率大于Y,那么这三条线中最高的是这条线,这条线表示我中的收益

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • So, for example, you might think Down is dominated, but if we look a bit carefully we see that Down actually does better than Up against Right, and Down does better than Middle against Left.

    例如说,你们可能认为下是个劣势策略,但仔细观察后你会发现,参与人II右时,下要上更好,参与人II左,中更好

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定