Here, the stopping of the train is like the interruption by memory of normal consciousness that's the basis of the poem.
这里,火车的停止就像是,被正常知觉的记忆所打断,那是这首诗的基础。
In fact nowhere else do we see Milton literally bursting out at the seams as he seems to in this poem.
其实弥尔顿在别处也没有,像在这首诗中一样离经叛道,完全爆发。
And this poem seemed like one you might find and be able to read yourself, without me there to explain it.
而这首诗似乎是一首,你们自己就可以读懂的,不用我多做解释的诗。
I am sure you recognize this as Stevens' "Anecdote of the Jar," but I will quickly quote to you the poem.
大家一定知道这首诗就是史蒂文斯的《坛子轶事》,但是我还是想快速地给大家读一下。
In Lycidas, Milton looks back at the Elder Brother's theodicy, and it's almost as if he's attempting to test its validity.
在这首诗中,弥尔顿回顾了《科玛斯》中哥哥的斯奥迪斯,似乎是在验证斯奥迪斯正确与否。
The first is the radical theology, and the second is this poem's equally radical and equally daring original verse form.
第一是它激进的神学观点,第二是这首诗,同样激进大胆的原始诗歌形式。
The poem's connection to music signifies the difference in point of view in these poems from reasoned speech.
这首诗和音乐的联系显示了,它和那些理由充分的演说在观点上的不同。
Now the subject matter that he's chosen for this poem, for this so-called first poem, couldn't possibly be more appropriate.
现在他选这首诗的主题很重要,这所谓第一首诗可能不太恰当。
Everyone agrees that what Milton is doing in the similes is educating the reader, the reader of this poem.
大家都同意弥尔顿想要通过这些直白的明喻,来教育这首诗的读者。
In fact, this is the Harvard student who wrote Prufrock; Eliot wrote Prufrock largely when still at Harvard and in the years immediately following.
实际上,写这首诗时他还是哈佛的一名学生;,艾略特在哈佛时以及随后的几年里,完成了这首诗的大部分。
The character of Peter brought directly out of the New Testament is really slicing through the poem's fictive veneer.
彼得的形象是直接从中借鉴而来的,在这首诗虚构的伪饰中显得格外犀利。
The very structure, in fact, of Milton's poem here is what Dr. Johnson would be obliged to call a remote allusion.
约翰逊称弥尔顿这首诗的结构,是遥远的幻境是不得已的。
When we look carefully at this poem, in fact, the distinction that Frost seems to make between fact and dream starts to give way.
事实上当我们仔细看这首诗时,弗罗斯特特别地区分了,事实和梦开始不再这么重要。
This shocking image, this impossible-to-imagine image of a brooding impregnation, establishes the foundation for two of this poem's most daring elements.
这个令人震惊,难以想象的,孵伏怀孕的景象为这首诗的两个,最为大胆的元素奠定了基础。
The woman's objection, as the poem unfolds, is summed up by his choice, the father's choice, to bury the child himself.
这首诗里揭示的这个女人的反对,从这个父亲的选择中就可以总结出,亲自埋葬这个孩子。
God is in control of the universe and if the poem seems -not that Stanley Fish believes in God, but nonetheless his Milton certainly does -God is in control of the universe.
上帝掌控着整个世界,如果这首诗看起来,-并不是费什信仰上帝,不过他的弥尔顿的确是,-上帝控制着整个世界。
Geoffrey Hartman's theory had a similar tendency to align the poem with a kind of a religious orthodoxy.
哈特曼的理论有着相似的趋势,给这首诗附加上一种宗教上的正统思想。
And the poetry that he stands for the fisherman stands for like all of Yeats's poetry is a poetry again of symbols.
这首诗代表了,渔夫代表了,和叶芝所有的诗一样,这是关于象征的诗。
In fact, this poem's power lies, I think, in its -not only its inability but its unwillingness to specify the content of that revelation.
实际上我觉得这首诗的力量,我想,在于,它不着重写启示的内容,也不愿意去写,启示的内容。
And Milton reasonably alerts his reader to the timeliness of a lot of the material that would be covered in this poem.
弥尔顿合乎情理的向他的读者们,发出了这首诗所要描写的大量内容的警戒。
It is, well, it's a great poem. There are lots of them that when I first started teaching this course I decided I wouldn't teach.
它是一首伟大的诗,有很多诗都是,我开始教这门课的时候就决定不去说这首诗。
Now we began Lycidas with an image of a poet who could only write this poem -- this is what we were told -with forced fingers rude.
现在我们带着一个只能创作出这首诗的诗人的印象,来看这首诗,手指粗暴的用力攥着。
I think now we can see why these lines about the autumnal leavesare so difficult for us to incorporate into a moral reading or a theological reading of the poem.
我们现在可以看到为什么,这些关于秋天的落叶的句子如此难以,与对这首诗的道德或者神学的理解相结合。
We're being asked to accept the fiction that Milton is having this very poem laid at the blessed feet of the infant Christ.
它想让我们接受这一幻景,幻景中弥尔顿正把这首诗,谦虚的在上帝圣洁的脚下安放。
The other character that's mentioned in the poem is the boy's father, whose trees they are, the property owner, who also is absent.
这首诗里提到的其他人是他的爸爸,这些树就是他爸爸的,这些财产的拥有者,但也没有出现。
In other words, the poem is full of complexities, but who says they're being reconciled?
其实,这首诗充满了矛盾,但是谁又说了这首诗协调了矛盾呢?
And so when the figure of Orpheus appears in this poem, it's the second half of the Orpheus story that Milton is forced to tell.
因此当俄耳甫斯的形象出现在这首诗中时,弥尔顿要讲的是他生平的后一段。
So look at the first lines of the poem. This is page 211 in the Hughes.
看这首诗的前几行,在休斯版的211页。
I'll bet you, even if you're reading this for the second or the third time, you were surprised again when you came to this point.
我敢说,即使是第二遍或第三遍读这首诗,读到这儿时你们还是会感到惊讶。
应用推荐