But it's not quite true, because typically what they actually do that, is they say it's adjusted for risk.
但是这是不对的,因为它们实际上就是存在这种情况,它们会根据风险进行调整。
It might be true that those cases do happen, but I really think they are not the norm.
虽然有这种案例,但我并不认为这是一种普遍情况。
Is it one basically? In which case, just return a copy the list. That's the simple case.
是最基本的情况吗?在这种情况下,仅仅返回一个列表的拷贝,这是简单的情况。
Taking the problem, recognizing that you know what, 8 even though this is a pretty big problem size 8 in this case and last time it was size 8 or in the case of the papers in size of a thousand roughly with the phonebook, I assume these are in a perfectly straight line they won't quite fit.
以这个问题为例,你们要认识到,在这种情况下,这是个比较大的问题,其大小是,上次它的大小也是8,但在纸片那个问题中,电话簿的规模大概是上千的,现在假设这些,杯子完全在同一条直线上,虽然并不十分符合这个条件。
Well, I just think that if he was making his own original idea and it was his idea to start with, then that would be the only situation in which I would see it being appropriate in any way because that way you couldn't make the argument that he was pressured, you know it's three-to-one or whatever the ratio was.
我只是认为,如果这就是他的本意,是他主动要求被杀的,只有在这种情况下,我才认为无论从哪方面来说都是恰当的,因为那样的话,就不能说派克是被迫的,毕竟当时是3对1的局面,派克不占优势。
Now I'm in better shape, right? Especially for really large n or for a lot of k, because now in general, this is going to be smaller than that.
很大的k也大的情况,因为这样这就比这个小了,这种情况是分摊。
It's kind of a stupid lack of feature that this is the case, but notice that here is main, at the top of my file.
这是有点笨的,缺少特征的,就是这种情况,但是注意这里是main函数,在我的文件的顶端。
I didn't just make it one smaller, I made it a half smaller. That's a nice deal.OK.
我把它的规模减半了,这太棒了,好,但是我不会直接处理b是偶数这种情况的。
应用推荐