This is a good way to actually check if your Lewis structure is correct or not.

这是检验你的路易斯结构,是否正确的一个好方法。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

I think it depends on whether the list is odd or even in length. Actually, that's probably not true. With one, it'll probably always get it down there, but if I've made it just equal to two I might have lost.

是奇数还是偶数，事实上,这是不正确的，如果最后剩下一个,那可能得到了结果,如果剩下两个，可能错了,所以，首先我们要格外。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

I want to derive the last result in another way, then I will stop, and that's pretty interesting because it tells you the use and abuse of calculus.

让我用其他方法解答最后一个问题,然后今天就到这 这是一个挺有意思的题,因为它展示了微积分的正确用法和错误用法

耶鲁公开课 - 基础物理课程节选

So, this is generally true.

这是一个普遍正确的结果。

麻省理工公开课 - 热力学与动力学课程节选

This is a true or false value.

这是一个正确或错误的值。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

- Now that's a slight lie-- or actually in these days of political debates, a slight misspeaking, a wonderful word-- -- it is technically correct. It is enough to allow us to write any program, but it's not enough to allow us to easily write any program.

现在还有点说谎的感觉,或者在这些强调政治辩论的日子中，可以说成是有些词不达意-,这是一个绝妙的形容词,在语义上是完全正确的，用这种语言我们可以编写任何程序,但是不能轻松地编写程序。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

The unsorted, and you have exactly the point I want to get to-- how come all the guys, sorry, all the people answering questions are way, way up in the back? Wow. that's a Tim Wakefield pitch right there, all right. Thank you.

所有的同学，抱歉,所有的人们都是这么回答的，扔到后面，哇，这是一个Tim，Wakefield式的投掷啊，谢谢！,他完全正确，不是么？这比这小么？

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

It's a little more readable because I'm using a Boolean value that tells me, the programmer, this is true or this is false.

它更具有可读性一点,因为我使用了一个bool值，它告诉我或程序员，这是正确的或这是错误的。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选