So, if you want to attack urban air quality, this is probably moving in the wrong direction, OK?
所以如果你想攻击都市的空气质量,这可能是一个错误的方向,对吗?
It's really impossible, in fact, that you not have some opinions about this work, because it's an intimate part of our culture.
但实际上要你们对这想,是不太可能的,因为这已经成为我们文化不可或缺的一部分了。
So, for example, you might be familiar with Wellbutrin here, this is a type of anti-depressant that a lot of people use right now that are taking anti-depressants.
比如,你可能对这里的安非他酮很熟悉,这是一种抗抑郁症的药,很多治疗抑郁症的人都在用它。
So, she would refuse to take part in it; it doesn't sound right to her-- I'll trust in prayer and other things.
所以她可能就不会买保险,这对她来说是不道德的,她宁愿相信祈祷之类的事情
All right, so that's a weak argument, but in fact, it's a way of suggesting, probably not.
这是一种提议,可能是错的,好了,那我们对一个列表。
There is that sense of space, of expansiveness, the possibility of travel.
这是一种空间感,延伸感,对旅行可能性的感受。
if we do introduce a third possibility-- I'm not sure this is the right thing.
如果确实加入这一种可能-,我不确定这是对的。
And, that's what Rutherford says, this can't be right.
这就是卢瑟福所的,这不可能是对的。
Well that's one possible definition of food.
这是对食品的一种可能的定义
So that's a shot fired across the bow against the author because it's Barthes' supposition that the author isn't maybe even quite an author function because that function may be hard to identify in a discrete way among myriad other functions.
因而这是对作者的警告,因为巴特推测,作者可能甚至都不是功能性的,因为这种功能可能很难通过分离的方式,在很多其他功能中被辨认出来。
Power is something - and this is what we learn from a reading of John Milton - power is something that is created by a human process of deification, a process of king-worship or a process of God-worship or book-worship or a process, for that matter, of poet-worship.
力量是,-通过阅读弥尔顿我们就会知道,力量就是人们崇拜外物,不断将其神化的产物,这可能是对国王,上帝,或书本的崇拜,或者,就此而言,对诗人的崇拜。
Getting good at this is probably the single most important skill for debugging.
熟悉这一点对调试来说,可能是最重要的技能了。
Suppose the soul theorist answers that last objection by saying,Ain't ever going to happen.
假设灵魂理论者对上个异议的答案是,这事情根本不可能发生。
It could be that even though the general claim, "It takes one to know one" Is false, the particular claim, "Eternal, non-physical can only be grasped by the eternal, non-physical," Maybe that particular claim is true.
即使一般来说,同类互知这个观点是错的,但它的特例,也就是永恒的非现实的东西只能被永恒的,非现实的东西所理解,这可能是对的
If it were linear, which 32% of you seem have thought, that would have meant that our Lewis structure had no lone pairs in it, right, and that's not the case.
如果是直线,就像32%的同学认为的那样,这意味着Lewis结构里没有孤对,对吧,这是不可能的。
You might say, why? Well it turns out there's some trade-offs to it. It has some advantages in terms of power of storing things, it has some disadvantages, primarily in terms of access time.
那可能是某种意义上的权衡,对存储而言,这有优势,但访问的效率上就变成劣势了,幸运的是,python或者。
应用推荐