-
And the first thing you do is ask is it an instance of some problem that other people have already solved?
而且你以前从没碰过这个问题,你首先要做的一件事就是问问自己,这是不是一个别人已经解决了的问题？
-
First of all, having read in that value, I can check to see, is it of the right type?
首先，读一下这个值，我们可以来检查看看是不是正确的类型？
-
I don't know a word of Russian, and so I actually try to avoid using the rather well-known Russian equivalents for these terms because I feel like an idiot.
我不懂俄语，所以我不用俄语读,而就用这个英语中通行的俄语替代词,这样感觉是不是挺傻的。
-
I'm asking is that the very same extended-through-time entity as the extended-through-time entity that I used to own. I wonder.
我问的是,现在的这个贯穿时间的物体,是不是当年我拥有的,贯穿时间的物体。
-
Is that how important is it that we get control of that border and seal it, so to speak.
对于我们来说,控制或者是夺取这个关口，是不是很重要呢。
-
So, whether or not the email is addressed specifically to you in like the two field or if maybe you were BCC'd or it's a big email list of which you're just part, that could signify that this is in fact useful for you.
所以，不管这个邮件是不是,单独发给你的,或者这个邮件有一个大的邮件列表,而你正在其中，其实这也暗示了,这个邮件对你是有用的。
-
Question, is this amount of work a good amount of work or a bad amount of work?
问题是这个工作量,是不是最优的工作量呢
-
You played the game; I don't know if there's a videogame now, if people play games like this where London Bridge is Falling Down.
你们也玩过这个游戏吧,我不知道现在是不是有电子游戏了,如果有人玩过伦敦桥这个游戏
-
It's a really very interesting question about whether that thing on the left is really food.
有个问题非常有意思,左边的这个东西究竟是不是食品
-
Much more from Plato. So again it raises the issue, if you want to know most about the most influential aspects for Western civilization, would it be better for you to take an entire semester on Plato than it would on the New Testament?
源自柏拉图，所以又回到这个问题上了，如果你想了解,西方文明最有影响力的方方面面，那是不是参加有关柏拉图课程,比新约课程更有用呢？
-
What do we do to tell whether that change will happen spontaneously?
我们如何才能知道,这个变化是不是自发的？
-
Is that too broad of a question? You can reframe that.
这个问题是不是太宽泛了？，您可以重新定义。
-
Well, it's a little bit hard to tell exactly, isn't it?
这个,有一点难以分辨,是不是
-
The goldsmith would accept that as part of an extension of the business as a goldsmith, especially if the gold was in the form of coins and people didn't care whether they got the same coins back.
金匠会接受这个请求,作为金匠生意的衍生项目,尤其是,需要保存的是金币,人们不在乎,他们拿回的金币是不是原来送去的那些
-
Some people like to use shallow and deep, object and value, but they're talking about the same thing, which is it the same object or is it the same, in this case, set of values, depending on what you want to define as you use it.
有些人喜欢用对象相等值相等,但是它们是同一件东西，也就是是不是同一个对象，或者是不是同样的，在这个例子中，是同样的值集合，这取决于当你使用它的时候,想要怎么来定义它。
-
Is it the hero of the story bent on remaining ignorant of the castrato hidden beneath the woman?
是不是故事的主人公还没有意识到,这个歌手其实是男人？
-
Or another way of thinking about it, is remember I said when I call that class definition it creates an instance, that's a pointer to some spot in memory that's got some local information around it.
也就是一个指向，内存中某处的指针,这个地方存有一些,这个实例的信息，浅意义的相等也就是说,看看这两个东西是不是。
-
That's a quite difficult argument to pin down does it work or does it not work.
这个论证很难确定,是不是说得通。
-
Close reading, the idea that you could take a text and do things with it--that the interpretation of a text wasn't just a matter of saying, "Oh, yes, it's about this and isn't it beautiful?"
当你拿到一篇文章之后,你所能做的不只是说些像,“哦，这是关于这个的，它读起来，是不是很美啊“之类的话“
-
And by that I mean, do the set of primitives support a broad range of applications, or is it really aimed at a very specific set of applications?
也就是说这个基本集合，是不是支持,比较多的程序，或者是不是面向,某一特定种类的程序的？
-
Do I think it's the right answer?
问问自己这个答案是不是正确的？
-
Good. The question was, "When I talk about creativity here, am I trying to build in some appeal to the feeling that we may have when we're being creative?"
这个问题是,当我在这里讨论创造力的时候,我是不是想引入那些"当我们有创造力时,我们可能会有什么样的感受"的观点
-
Is it a name that rings a bell?
这个名字是不是让你们想到点什么了
-
So this looks much different, doesn't it?
这个看起来就很不同了,是不是
-
This is the most recent version of this that--and we'll talk about whether this graphic makes sense to people, whether it's the kind of information people can access, and make use of, whether people even pay attention to it or know about it.
这是最近的修订版本,我们来讨论一下,这个图是不是够简单明了,提供的是不是人们可获取和利用的信息呢,甚至人们没有注意或者知道有这么个图表
-
OK, here we go, here we go, you see, I'm doing it down here, I can't see it, does that-- ah, I hear his sighs of relief, OK, good. There we go. Better. All right.
好，我们开始，大家可以看到，我在这里写这个程序，我看不见，这是不是-啊，我听到大家放松的叹气了，好，让我们开始吧，好多了，好。
-
p1 But if I say, are p 1 and p 2 the same point, it says yes.
和p2是不是同一个点，It，says，no。,返回的结果是肯定的，在这里我有个要强调的点，这个例子里发生的是。
-
Armed with your pet diagnosis of where the argument goes wrong there, you've got to ask, "Does it also go wrong in the mind and body case?"
当你找到了一种判断这个论证,是否错误的方法时,你肯定会问,在心灵与身体的问题上,是不是也出了同样的错误
-
And that may generalize again and it keeps going until you either get back to Adam and Eve, I guess. I don't think they were born in the US as far as I know, or you find somebody who satisfies that definition or you find that none of your parents actually are in that category.
降低到我的父亲或者母亲,是不是天生的美国公民呢,这个问题可以继续向下分解,你甚至可以追溯到亚当和夏娃的时候,据我所知它们并不是出生在美国的,或者你要么找到一个符合定义的人,要么发现你的父母都不满足条件。
-
Is it true that the invisible things can't be destroyed.
无形的东西不能毁灭,这个说法是不是正确的。
应用推荐