It's based on a confusion. Once we see the confusion, we can see what the answer to our question is.
是在混淆概念,一旦弄清了混淆的地方,这个问题就好回答了
Now we've set it up as a matrix, let's try again that question I asked before.
现在我们就把这个矩阵写好了,我们现在来回答之前的问题
And this Robber's Cave study serves as a nice illustration of morality in everyday life.
这个罗伯洞穴实验就很好地解释了,日常生活中的道德。
You might say that the best way to learn what political philosophy is is simply to study and read the works of those ! who have shaped the field--yes right?
你们可能会认为,学习政治哲学最好的方式,只要研读那些,形塑这个领域的著作就好了,没错吧?
Often a good thing to start with is to put the lowest ionization energy atom in the middle, and if you don't have charge separation then go with that structure, but if you do find you have a lot of separation, such as the case in negative 2, positive 2, and minus 1, then you want to say wait a second, this is really bad in terms of formal charge, let me go ahead and see what other options I have here.
通常一开始把电离能最低的原子,放在中心位置就很好了,如果你发现电荷没有分开,那么这个结构就没问题了,但是如果你发现有很多分开的电荷,比如这种情况,有负二,正二和负一,那么你会想要说等一下,从形式电荷来看这很不好,让我去看看其它可能的选择。
应用推荐