And so what this gave us was a very, very useful general criterion for determining whether something happened spontaneously.

这个告诉我们的是一个,非常非常一般的判据,他能帮助我们判断一个过程是否自发进行。

麻省理工公开课 - 热力学与动力学课程节选

The kinds of arguments we have been considering so far all fall under the general rubric of "Inference to the best explanation."

目前为止 我们讨论的这些论证,都是在 "最佳解释推理",这个一般准则下进行的的

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

That's, there are whole courses on that, there's some great courses here on that, it takes some mathematical sophistication, we're going to push that off a little bit.

有一些课程是专门讲这个的，那些课一般都涉及，一些复杂的数学问题，我们只是简单的讲一些基础知识。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

So, should I be drawing these boxes four times bigger since ints are four times bigger than chars usually?

所以，我应该把这个盒子画成4倍大,因为一般int型是char型的4倍大小？

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

So, in general, there is some support, at least at a very broad level, for the claim that language is in some sense part of human nature.

总的来说,语言在某种意义上,是人类本性一部分的这个观点,至少在一般性水平上,得到了一些支持

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

If you invented it, we'd call it whatever your name is, but this is the guy who invented it, so it's called a Newton, usually denoted by a capital N.

如果是你发明的,我们就用你的名字当单位,但这个单位是他发明的,所以叫它牛顿,一般用大写字母 N 表示

耶鲁公开课 - 基础物理课程节选

It could be that even though the general claim, "It takes one to know one" Is false, the particular claim, "Eternal, non-physical can only be grasped by the eternal, non-physical," Maybe that particular claim is true.

即使一般来说,同类互知这个观点是错的,但它的特例,也就是永恒的非现实的东西只能被永恒的,非现实的东西所理解,这可能是对的

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选