So here's my attempt to make the question both a bit more precise, and a question that's an open question.

我正尝试,让这两个问题变得更准确,这是个开放性的问题

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Just put the question behind the two words, "do you" and you can ask anything.

把问题放在“do you”这两个词后面，你就可以随便问了。

Do you 课堂 - SpeakingMax英语口语达人

Those are questions that are going to frame the two lectures that I give on this novel.

由这两个问题,我把这本书分两堂课来讲。

耶鲁公开课 - 1945年后的美国小说课程节选

Second, I'd like to identify two key questions that I really think important for you to be thinking about and addressing in the area of new technology and education.

接着确定两个关键问题,这两个问题很重要,你们要好好想想怎样,在新技术和教育中定位。

麻省理工公开课 - 媒体、教育、市场课程节选

To some degree, I am inclined to answer that both of those questions have something to them.

某种程度看来,我倾向于回答这两个问题,皆与之有关连。

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

And zoom on the easiest question for you, that way two things happen.

放大对你来说最容易的问题，这是这两个事发生的方式。

麻省理工公开课 - 固态化学导论课程节选

So here is where our question comes, because where do we put it?

这里我们的问题就来了，我们该把这两个电子放在哪里？

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

We want to ask the question, What are these two quantities?

我们想问一个问题，这两个量是什么？

麻省理工公开课 - 热力学与动力学课程节选

Of course, often, I think, people run together these two questions.

当然，我想通常，这两个问题都是并驾齐驱的。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

But first, I want to start with the assignment I gave you last time, and I asked you all to think about these two questions and write some things down.

首先,让我们看看,上节课留的作业,我要求你们都思考,下面这两个问题并写下感想

耶鲁公开课 - 生物医学工程探索课程节选

God bless. Oh, sorry, that wasn't a sneeze, it was a two? How many swaps do I do in bubble sort? A lot. Right. Potentially a lot because I'm constantly doing that, that says I'm running that inner loop a whole bunch of times.

上帝保佑，哦，抱歉，我没说清楚，这是两个问题,在冒泡排序中要做多少次排序？许多，正确的,可能要做很多次，因为在持续的干,这就意味着它要做很多次内部循环。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

I took my role to sniff that out, and to make sure the president heard 2 and 4 on an important issue, and was able to make the decision himself.

我的作用就是发现这些，保证总统可以听到2和4这两个观点4,在一些重要问题上，然后他能自己做决定。

普林斯顿公开课 - 国际座谈会课程节选

I will answer both questions.

我来回答这两个问题。

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

So those are the two questions that I rest you with.

这就是,我留给你们的两个问题。

麻省理工公开课 - 媒体、教育、市场课程节选

At the end of last class,I began to raise the question as to whether or not we should distinguish two questions that we would normally be inclined to run together.

在上节课的最后我提出以下问题,是否该要区别这两个,我们通常倾向于一视同仁的问题。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

If you see a problem that asks you, for example, the third ionization energy versus taking a second electron out of the 2 s in a photoelectron spectroscopy experiment, those are two very different things.

如果你遇到一个题目问你的是，比如说，是第三电离能,还是在光电子能谱实验中从，2，s，轨道中,拿走第二个电子，这可是两个完全不同的问题。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

Now as I say, I believe that when push comes to shove, we do need to get clear about both of those questions and so that's going to take the first several weeks of the class.

如果想深入了解这个话题,就必须弄清楚这两个问题,这就是头几周课的主要内容

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选