And I will leave the supreme court up to the rest of you. There is an election coming up.
最高法院那个事情就交给你们了,这不马上要选举了。
Not only are we taking away an electron here, but we're also going to decrease shielding, so the electrons that are already in there are going to feel a higher z effective and will be pulling and the atom will be getting smaller.
这不只是因为我们拿走了一个电子,还因为我们这样做会减小屏蔽效应,这样留下的电子,将会感受到更大的有效核电量,也就会感受到更强的吸引力,使得原子变得更小。
Doesn't that suggest that it's a mistake to try to put monetary figures on questions of human life?
这不就表明,用金钱衡量人的生命,是个错误吗?
Locke thought no, you couldn't possibly take this view seriously if you thought about what it meant.
洛克认为这不可能,只要想想这意味这什么,你就不可能相信这个观点。
And you might say, wait a minute, isn't that a string, and the answer's no, I didn't say it's a string by putting quotes around it And notice how the machine responds differently to it.
你会想,等等,这不是个字符串么?,答案是否定的,我没用引号包围它就意味着它不是字符串,请注意计算机对它给出了不同的反应。
Once again, in many ways, we see Socrates dissolving the bonds of the familiar.
从很多方面看来,这不就再一次让我们看到苏格拉底解开常规的束缚。
If I look at different points in my container during that path, I'm going to have to use a different value of pressure or different value of temperature That's not an equilibrium state, and that process turns out then to be an irreversible process.
如果我要研究在路径中容器里的,不同的点,我就得在容器里不同的点上使用,不同的压强值,或不同的温度值,实际上这不是个平衡态,这个过程是,不可逆过程。
Now, that's not a huge number but, obviously, when you're hoping to beat the market by a point or two losing by 0.3% per year because of your market timing inability is a bad thing.
看起来这不是个巨大的数字,明显地,当你希望获得,高于市场水平一到两个百分点的回报率,却由于抓不住市场时机而每年亏个0.3%,就很糟糕了
If we all have a desire to know, ? doesn't this connote something universal, that all should be free, that all should participate in ruling and being ruled as citizens of a city?
如果我们都有求知欲,这不就意味着一种普遍性吗,即所有的人都应是自由人,所有的公民应参与城市中的统治,与被统治的活动?
应用推荐