It doesn't really-- well, let me just say what the polis claims to do here in Homer.
这并不算...,我还是说说在荷马时代,城邦是如何阐明法律的
STUDENT: So, how do you come to a conclusion as to which you should use then, if you can determine the size based on solution, or based on input, so how do you decide?
学生:所以,你怎样决定你该用,哪个来算呢?现在如果你可以选择是,基于解决方案的大小,还是基于输入的大小,你应该怎样决定呢?
Now, I could go on right the way through here, but I'm going to stop because it gets to be a bit boring after a while.
我可以就这样一直算下去,但是还是到此为止吧,因为再这样下去会很无聊
Those are not necessarily bad reasons to take this course, and with the exception of the sex part, this course might actually help you out with some of these things.
作为选择这门课程的理由,这些倒也并不算太差,当然除了性这个方面,这门课实际上还是能够帮助你们,解决一些问题的
On the one hand, the optimists might say, "Even when we throw in the extra interaction effects, even the negative interaction effects, the overall nature of the human condition is positive.
一方面,乐观主义者可能说,“就算我们把另外的相互影响,就算把负面的相互影响算进去,人类处境的总体本质还是积极的。
But it's positive 1.5% per year, time-weighted--that's the number that you see in the prospectus or the number that you see in the advertisements so you say, what's the big deal, no harm no foul.
但算下来回报率每年还是正的1.5%,时间加权回报率,是你在招股说明书中,或是在广告中会看到的数字,你会说,没什么大不了,既没损失,也不违法
So the best response for Player 1, as a function of what Player 2 chooses, q2, is just equal to the q1 hat in this expression and if I solve that out carefully, I will no doubt make a mistake, but let's try it.
这个就是参与人1的最佳对策,它是参与人2策略q2的一个函数,它和之前的q1帽那个表达式是相等的,虽然我是很仔细地计算的,还是有可能算错的,我来验证一下
应用推荐